PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TUG vs. TUGN
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

TUG vs. TUGN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in STF Tactical Growth ETF (TUG) and STF Tactical Growth & Income ETF (TUGN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

TUG vs. TUGN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
TUG
STF Tactical Growth ETF
-6.31%20.43%19.37%38.24%-12.62%
TUGN
STF Tactical Growth & Income ETF
-6.61%19.11%18.44%34.84%-18.78%

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with TUG having a -6.31% return and TUGN slightly lower at -6.61%.


TUG

1D
3.35%
1M
-4.80%
YTD
-6.31%
6M
-3.64%
1Y
22.12%
3Y*
17.38%
5Y*
10Y*

TUGN

1D
3.10%
1M
-4.72%
YTD
-6.61%
6M
-6.35%
1Y
19.88%
3Y*
16.64%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


TUG vs. TUGN - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both TUG and TUGN have an expense ratio of 0.65%.


Return for Risk

TUG vs. TUGN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TUG
TUG Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
TUG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TUG Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
TUG Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
TUG Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
TUG Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

TUGN
TUGN Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
TUGN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TUGN Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
TUGN Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
TUGN Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
TUGN Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TUG vs. TUGN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for STF Tactical Growth ETF (TUG) and STF Tactical Growth & Income ETF (TUGN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TUGTUGNDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.01

0.93

+0.08

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.57

1.46

+0.12

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.21

0.00

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.83

1.54

+0.29

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.55

5.16

+1.40

TUG vs. TUGN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TUG Sharpe Ratio is 1.01, which is comparable to the TUGN Sharpe Ratio of 0.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TUG and TUGN, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TUGTUGNDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.01

0.93

+0.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.75

0.59

+0.16

Correlation

The correlation between TUG and TUGN is 0.93, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

TUG vs. TUGN - Dividend Comparison

TUG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.83%, less than TUGN's 12.75% yield.


TTM2025202420232022
TUG
STF Tactical Growth ETF
1.83%1.75%4.97%1.34%1.14%
TUGN
STF Tactical Growth & Income ETF
12.75%11.50%11.84%10.83%7.58%

Drawdowns

TUG vs. TUGN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TUG drawdown since its inception was -22.27%, smaller than the maximum TUGN drawdown of -23.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TUG and TUGN.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


TUGTUGNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.27%

-23.45%

+1.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.31%

-12.96%

+0.65%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.37%

-10.26%

+0.89%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.45%

-6.65%

+2.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.44%

3.87%

-0.43%

Volatility

TUG vs. TUGN - Volatility Comparison

STF Tactical Growth ETF (TUG) has a higher volatility of 6.53% compared to STF Tactical Growth & Income ETF (TUGN) at 5.87%. This indicates that TUG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TUGN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


TUGTUGNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.53%

5.87%

+0.66%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.00%

11.73%

+1.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.07%

21.54%

+0.53%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.08%

17.01%

+1.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.08%

17.01%

+1.07%