PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TUG vs. QQC.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

TUG vs. QQC.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in STF Tactical Growth ETF (TUG) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 Index ETF CAD Hedged (QQC.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

TUG vs. QQC.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
TUG
STF Tactical Growth ETF
-6.31%20.43%19.37%38.24%-12.62%
QQC.TO
Invesco NASDAQ 100 Index ETF CAD Hedged
-5.91%20.90%25.01%55.18%-7.85%
Different Trading Currencies

TUG is traded in USD, while QQC.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the QQC.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TUG achieves a -6.31% return, which is significantly lower than QQC.TO's -5.91% return.


TUG

1D
3.35%
1M
-4.80%
YTD
-6.31%
6M
-3.64%
1Y
22.12%
3Y*
17.38%
5Y*
10Y*

QQC.TO

1D
3.26%
1M
-4.77%
YTD
-5.91%
6M
-3.54%
1Y
23.72%
3Y*
22.26%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


TUG vs. QQC.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

TUG has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than QQC.TO's 0.20% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

TUG vs. QQC.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TUG
TUG Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
TUG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TUG Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
TUG Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
TUG Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
TUG Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

QQC.TO
QQC.TO Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
QQC.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQC.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQC.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
QQC.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQC.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TUG vs. QQC.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for STF Tactical Growth ETF (TUG) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 Index ETF CAD Hedged (QQC.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TUGQQC.TODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.01

1.05

-0.05

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.57

1.63

-0.05

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.23

-0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.83

1.83

0.00

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.55

6.82

-0.27

TUG vs. QQC.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TUG Sharpe Ratio is 1.01, which is comparable to the QQC.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TUG and QQC.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TUGQQC.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.01

1.05

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.75

0.55

+0.19

Correlation

The correlation between TUG and QQC.TO is 0.87, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

TUG vs. QQC.TO - Dividend Comparison

TUG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.83%, more than QQC.TO's 0.41% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021
TUG
STF Tactical Growth ETF
1.83%1.75%4.97%1.34%1.14%0.00%
QQC.TO
Invesco NASDAQ 100 Index ETF CAD Hedged
0.41%0.39%0.45%0.54%0.91%0.56%

Drawdowns

TUG vs. QQC.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TUG drawdown since its inception was -22.27%, smaller than the maximum QQC.TO drawdown of -35.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TUG and QQC.TO.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


TUGQQC.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.27%

-31.81%

+9.54%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.31%

-13.02%

+0.71%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.37%

-9.37%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.45%

-8.30%

+3.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.44%

4.31%

-0.87%

Volatility

TUG vs. QQC.TO - Volatility Comparison

STF Tactical Growth ETF (TUG) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 Index ETF CAD Hedged (QQC.TO) have volatilities of 6.53% and 6.50%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


TUGQQC.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.53%

6.50%

+0.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.00%

12.72%

+0.28%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.07%

22.59%

-0.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.08%

22.75%

-4.67%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.08%

22.75%

-4.67%