CTAP vs. VOO
CTAP (Simplify US Equity PLUS Managed Futures Strategy ETF) and VOO (Vanguard S&P 500 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CTAP is a Diversified Portfolio fund actively managed by Simplify, while VOO is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. CTAP is actively managed, while VOO is passively managed. At a 0.27 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CTAP charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VOO.
Performance
CTAP vs. VOO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CTAP achieves a 8.42% return, which is significantly lower than VOO's 9.75% return.
CTAP
- 1D
- -1.08%
- 1M
- -12.31%
- YTD
- 8.42%
- 6M
- 7.64%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VOO
- 1D
- -0.29%
- 1M
- 0.08%
- YTD
- 9.75%
- 6M
- 9.30%
- 1Y
- 26.77%
- 3Y*
- 21.36%
- 5Y*
- 13.58%
- 10Y*
- 15.77%
CTAP vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CTAP Simplify US Equity PLUS Managed Futures Strategy ETF | 8.42% | 2.22% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 9.75% | 0.05% |
Correlation
The correlation between CTAP and VOO is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 9, 2025 | 0.27 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CTAP vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank
CTAP
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
VOO
CTAP vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Simplify US Equity PLUS Managed Futures Strategy ETF (CTAP) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CTAP | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.39 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 3.02 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 13.58 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CTAP vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CTAP drawdown since its inception was -15.19%, smaller than the maximum VOO drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CTAP and VOO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CTAP | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.19% | -33.99% | +18.80% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -8.90% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -18.69% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -24.52% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.99% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -15.07% | -1.74% | -13.33% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.99% | -3.68% | +0.69% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.98% | — |
Volatility
CTAP vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CTAP | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.60% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 9.73% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.37% | 12.39% | +11.98% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.37% | 16.90% | +7.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.37% | 18.05% | +6.32% |
CTAP vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison
CTAP has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
CTAP vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison
CTAP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.73%, less than VOO's 1.04% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CTAP Simplify US Equity PLUS Managed Futures Strategy ETF | 0.73% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 1.04% | 1.13% | 1.24% | 1.46% | 1.69% | 1.25% | 1.54% | 1.88% | 2.06% | 1.78% | 2.02% | 2.10% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CTAP and VOO have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VOO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VOO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for CTAP.
VOO has the higher dividend yield at 1.04%, compared with 0.73% for CTAP.
CTAP is categorized as Diversified Portfolio, while VOO is S&P 500. They also come from different issuers: Simplify and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for CTAP and 0.03% for VOO.
Find the right allocation for CTAP and VOO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer