TTMI vs. CLS
TTMI (TTM Technologies, Inc.) and CLS (Celestica Inc.) are both stocks. Both operate in the Electronic Components industry within the Technology sector. Over the past 10 years, TTMI returned 37.89%/yr vs 43.71%/yr for CLS. At a 0.43 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
TTMI vs. CLS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TTMI achieves a 181.23% return, which is significantly higher than CLS's 32.99% return. Over the past 10 years, TTMI has underperformed CLS with an annualized return of 37.89%, while CLS has yielded a comparatively higher 43.71% annualized return.
TTMI
- 1D
- 3.65%
- 1M
- 14.94%
- YTD
- 181.23%
- 6M
- 164.27%
- 1Y
- 432.81%
- 3Y*
- 140.84%
- 5Y*
- 66.64%
- 10Y*
- 37.89%
CLS
- 1D
- 1.88%
- 1M
- 5.52%
- YTD
- 32.99%
- 6M
- 28.26%
- 1Y
- 200.71%
- 3Y*
- 207.28%
- 5Y*
- 116.26%
- 10Y*
- 43.71%
TTMI vs. CLS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TTMI TTM Technologies, Inc. | 181.23% | 178.79% | 56.55% | 4.84% | 1.21% | 8.01% | -8.34% | 54.68% | -37.91% | 14.97% |
CLS Celestica Inc. | 32.99% | 220.27% | 215.23% | 159.80% | 1.26% | 37.92% | -2.42% | -5.70% | -16.32% | -11.56% |
Correlation
The correlation between TTMI and CLS is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 25, 2000 | 0.43 |
Over the past year, TTMI and CLS have become more correlated (0.65) than their long-term average of 0.43, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Fundamentals
TTMI:
$1.68
CLS:
$8.28
TTMI:
115.66
CLS:
47.45
TTMI:
1.61
CLS:
0.64
TTMI:
7.06
CLS:
3.30
TTMI:
$2.91B
CLS:
$13.81B
TTMI:
$590.75M
CLS:
$1.60B
TTMI:
$402.84M
CLS:
$1.32B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TTMI vs. CLS — Risk / Return Rank
TTMI
CLS
TTMI vs. CLS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TTM Technologies, Inc. (TTMI) and Celestica Inc. (CLS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TTMI | CLS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +3.21 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.71 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.57 | 1.37 | +0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 18.76 | 6.91 | +11.85 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 53.30 | 16.83 | +36.47 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TTMI vs. CLS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TTMI drawdown since its inception was -94.68%, roughly equal to the maximum CLS drawdown of -96.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TTMI and CLS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TTMI | CLS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -94.68% | -96.93% | +2.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.26% | -29.24% | +5.98% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -34.24% | -53.96% | +19.72% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.69% | -53.96% | +18.27% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -56.19% | -80.60% | +24.41% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.47% | -16.78% | +15.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -49.82% | -73.31% | +23.49% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.17% | 11.98% | -3.81% |
Volatility
TTMI vs. CLS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for TTM Technologies, Inc. (TTMI) is 22.89%, while Celestica Inc. (CLS) has a volatility of 27.54%. This indicates that TTMI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CLS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TTMI | CLS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 22.89% | 27.54% | -4.65% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 58.82% | 55.42% | +3.40% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 72.82% | 72.65% | +0.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 49.51% | 57.70% | -8.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 45.57% | 49.97% | -4.40% |
Dividends
TTMI vs. CLS - Dividend Comparison
Neither TTMI nor CLS has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
TTMI vs. CLS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between TTM Technologies, Inc. and Celestica Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
TTMI vs. CLS - Profitability Comparison
TTMI - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, TTM Technologies, Inc. reported a gross profit of 154.94M and revenue of 774.32M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 20.0%.
CLS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Celestica Inc. reported a gross profit of 437.20M and revenue of 4.05B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 10.8%.
TTMI - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, TTM Technologies, Inc. reported an operating income of 76.92M and revenue of 774.32M, resulting in an operating margin of 9.9%.
CLS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Celestica Inc. reported an operating income of 272.10M and revenue of 4.05B, resulting in an operating margin of 6.7%.
TTMI - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, TTM Technologies, Inc. reported a net income of 50.69M and revenue of 774.32M, resulting in a net margin of 6.6%.
CLS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Celestica Inc. reported a net income of 212.30M and revenue of 4.05B, resulting in a net margin of 5.3%.
Frequently Asked Questions
TTMI and CLS have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CLS has higher volatility (27.54%) compared to TTMI (22.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TTMI dropped -94.68% vs CLS's -96.93%.
TTMI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.99 vs 2.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TTMI and CLS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer