TTDU vs. QTJL
TTDU (T-REX 2X Long TTD Daily Target ETF) and QTJL (Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.27 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TTDU charges 1.50%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for QTJL.
Performance
TTDU vs. QTJL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TTDU achieves a -77.55% return, which is significantly lower than QTJL's 7.15% return.
TTDU
- 1D
- -5.44%
- 1M
- -31.38%
- YTD
- -77.55%
- 6M
- -78.75%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QTJL
- 1D
- -0.01%
- 1M
- 1.20%
- YTD
- 7.15%
- 6M
- 7.91%
- 1Y
- 20.52%
- 3Y*
- 19.20%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TTDU vs. QTJL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
TTDU T-REX 2X Long TTD Daily Target ETF | -77.55% | -37.11% |
QTJL Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July | 7.15% | 4.10% |
Correlation
The correlation between TTDU and QTJL is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 18, 2025 | 0.27 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TTDU vs. QTJL — Risk / Return Rank
TTDU
QTJL
TTDU vs. QTJL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-REX 2X Long TTD Daily Target ETF (TTDU) and Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July (QTJL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TTDU | QTJL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.06 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.87 | 0.52 | -1.39 |
Drawdowns
TTDU vs. QTJL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TTDU drawdown since its inception was -89.89%, which is greater than QTJL's maximum drawdown of -33.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TTDU and QTJL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TTDU | QTJL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -89.89% | -33.40% | -56.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -6.68% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -22.43% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -89.89% | -0.01% | -89.88% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -59.22% | -7.94% | -51.28% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.27% | — |
Volatility
TTDU vs. QTJL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TTDU | QTJL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.31% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 7.61% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 107.88% | 10.01% | +97.87% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 107.88% | 20.42% | +87.46% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 107.88% | 20.42% | +87.46% |
TTDU vs. QTJL - Expense Ratio Comparison
TTDU has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than QTJL's 0.79% expense ratio.
Dividends
TTDU vs. QTJL - Dividend Comparison
Neither TTDU nor QTJL has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
TTDU and QTJL have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, QTJL is cheaper at 0.79% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
QTJL is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for TTDU.
TTDU and QTJL have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: T-Rex and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 1.50% for TTDU and 0.79% for QTJL.
Find the right allocation for TTDU and QTJL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer