PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TTDU vs. NRGU
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

TTDU vs. NRGU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T-REX 2X Long TTD Daily Target ETF (TTDU) and MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index 3X Leveraged ETN (NRGU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

TTDU vs. NRGU - Yearly Performance Comparison


Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TTDU achieves a -71.52% return, which is significantly lower than NRGU's 139.49% return.


TTDU

1D
-6.35%
1M
-23.71%
YTD
-71.52%
6M
-84.64%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

NRGU

1D
-10.75%
1M
24.81%
YTD
139.49%
6M
107.68%
1Y
69.15%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


TTDU vs. NRGU - Expense Ratio Comparison

TTDU has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than NRGU's 0.95% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

TTDU vs. NRGU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TTDU

NRGU
NRGU Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
NRGU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NRGU Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
NRGU Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
NRGU Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
NRGU Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TTDU vs. NRGU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-REX 2X Long TTD Daily Target ETF (TTDU) and MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index 3X Leveraged ETN (NRGU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

TTDU vs. NRGU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TTDUNRGUDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.95

0.61

-1.56

Correlation

The correlation between TTDU and NRGU is 0.08, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

TTDU vs. NRGU - Dividend Comparison

Neither TTDU nor NRGU has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

TTDU vs. NRGU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TTDU drawdown since its inception was -87.87%, which is greater than NRGU's maximum drawdown of -57.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TTDU and NRGU.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


TTDUNRGUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-87.87%

-57.50%

-30.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-55.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-87.17%

-17.40%

-69.77%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-50.23%

-25.38%

-24.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

27.12%

Volatility

TTDU vs. NRGU - Volatility Comparison


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


TTDUNRGUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

23.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

50.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

101.40%

88.18%

+13.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

101.40%

87.12%

+14.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

101.40%

87.12%

+14.28%