PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TTAI vs. TTAC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TTAI vs. TTAC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TrimTabs International Free Cash Flow Quality ETF of Benef Interest (TTAI) and TrimTabs US Free Cash Flow Quality ETF (TTAC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TTAI achieves a 3.82% return, which is significantly lower than TTAC's 17.95% return.


TTAI

1D
-0.18%
1M
1.51%
YTD
3.82%
6M
3.76%
1Y
8.28%
3Y*
9.76%
5Y*
1.76%
10Y*

TTAC

1D
0.27%
1M
4.06%
YTD
17.95%
6M
17.10%
1Y
20.65%
3Y*
19.14%
5Y*
12.83%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TTAI vs. TTAC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TTAI
TrimTabs International Free Cash Flow Quality ETF of Benef Interest
3.82%13.27%0.39%18.22%-24.37%16.87%18.30%24.52%-17.73%6.44%
TTAC
TrimTabs US Free Cash Flow Quality ETF
17.95%8.07%18.26%22.97%-14.60%30.66%18.30%26.03%-6.26%15.23%

Correlation

The correlation between TTAI and TTAC is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.77

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.73

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 25, 2017

0.71

The correlation between TTAI and TTAC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.

TTAI vs. TTAC - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
TTAI
TTAC

Technology

34.4%
29.5%

Consumer Cyclical

15.2%
12.7%

Healthcare

14.8%
11.9%

Industrials

11.1%
9.0%

Consumer Defensive

7.2%
8.0%

Financial Services

6.2%
14.5%

Communication Services

5.8%
6.1%

Basic Materials

2.4%
2.3%

Energy

1.9%
2.6%

Utilities

1.2%

-

Real Estate

-

2.0%

Technology

TTAI
34.4%
TTAC
29.5%

Consumer Cyclical

TTAI
15.2%
TTAC
12.7%

Healthcare

TTAI
14.8%
TTAC
11.9%

Industrials

TTAI
11.1%
TTAC
9.0%

Consumer Defensive

TTAI
7.2%
TTAC
8.0%

Financial Services

TTAI
6.2%
TTAC
14.5%

Communication Services

TTAI
5.8%
TTAC
6.1%

Basic Materials

TTAI
2.4%
TTAC
2.3%

Energy

TTAI
1.9%
TTAC
2.6%

Utilities

TTAI
1.2%
TTAC

-

Real Estate

TTAI

-

TTAC
2.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TTAI vs. TTAC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TTAI
TTAI Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
TTAI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TTAI Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
TTAI Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
TTAI Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
TTAI Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank

TTAC
TTAC Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
TTAC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TTAC Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
TTAC Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
TTAC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
TTAC Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TTAI vs. TTAC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TrimTabs International Free Cash Flow Quality ETF of Benef Interest (TTAI) and TrimTabs US Free Cash Flow Quality ETF (TTAC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TTAITTACDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.87

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.09

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

1.24

-0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.64

2.89

-2.26

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.27

9.37

-7.11

TTAI vs. TTAC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TTAI Sharpe Ratio is 0.49, which is lower than the TTAC Sharpe Ratio of 1.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TTAI and TTAC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TTAITTACDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.49

1.36

-0.87

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.10

0.75

-0.65

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.29

0.79

-0.50

Drawdowns

TTAI vs. TTAC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TTAI drawdown since its inception was -34.17%, roughly equal to the maximum TTAC drawdown of -34.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TTAI and TTAC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TTAITTACDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.17%

-34.95%

+0.78%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.00%

-7.17%

-5.83%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.34%

-19.92%

-1.42%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.13%

-21.88%

-12.25%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.51%

0.00%

-1.51%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.20%

-4.98%

-4.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.66%

2.21%

+1.45%

Volatility

TTAI vs. TTAC - Volatility Comparison

TrimTabs International Free Cash Flow Quality ETF of Benef Interest (TTAI) has a higher volatility of 5.92% compared to TrimTabs US Free Cash Flow Quality ETF (TTAC) at 4.02%. This indicates that TTAI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TTAC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TTAITTACDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.92%

4.02%

+1.90%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.17%

11.70%

+2.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.02%

15.31%

+1.71%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.92%

17.09%

-0.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.89%

18.71%

+0.18%

TTAI vs. TTAC - Expense Ratio Comparison

TTAI has a 0.61% expense ratio, which is higher than TTAC's 0.59% expense ratio.


Dividends

TTAI vs. TTAC - Dividend Comparison

TTAI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.45%, more than TTAC's 0.53% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
TTAC
TrimTabs US Free Cash Flow Quality ETF
0.53%0.62%0.70%0.94%1.36%9.63%0.41%0.72%0.62%0.40%
TTAI
TrimTabs International Free Cash Flow Quality ETF of Benef Interest
2.45%2.30%2.13%2.39%9.36%2.01%0.64%1.90%0.92%0.26%

Frequently Asked Questions


TTAI and TTAC have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TTAI has higher volatility (5.92%) compared to TTAC (4.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TTAI dropped -34.17% vs TTAC's -34.95%.

On 5-year performance, TTAC leads with 12.83% vs 1.76% for TTAI. On fees, TTAC is cheaper at 0.59% per year. On volatility, TTAC has been the lower-risk option at 4.02%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, TTAC has performed better with a 12.83% return vs 1.76%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TTAC is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.61% for TTAI.

TTAI has the higher dividend yield at 2.45%, compared with 0.53% for TTAC.

TTAI is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while TTAC is Large Cap Growth Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.61% for TTAI and 0.59% for TTAC.

TTAC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.36 vs 0.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TTAI and TTAC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer