TTAI vs. TTAC
TTAI (TrimTabs International Free Cash Flow Quality ETF of Benef Interest) and TTAC (TrimTabs US Free Cash Flow Quality ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TTAI is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund actively managed by TrimTabs, while TTAC is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by TrimTabs. Both are actively managed. Over the past 5 years, TTAI returned 1.76%/yr vs 12.83%/yr for TTAC. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TTAI charges 0.61%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for TTAC.
Performance
TTAI vs. TTAC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TTAI achieves a 3.82% return, which is significantly lower than TTAC's 17.95% return.
TTAI
- 1D
- -0.18%
- 1M
- 1.51%
- YTD
- 3.82%
- 6M
- 3.76%
- 1Y
- 8.28%
- 3Y*
- 9.76%
- 5Y*
- 1.76%
- 10Y*
- —
TTAC
- 1D
- 0.27%
- 1M
- 4.06%
- YTD
- 17.95%
- 6M
- 17.10%
- 1Y
- 20.65%
- 3Y*
- 19.14%
- 5Y*
- 12.83%
- 10Y*
- —
TTAI vs. TTAC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TTAI TrimTabs International Free Cash Flow Quality ETF of Benef Interest | 3.82% | 13.27% | 0.39% | 18.22% | -24.37% | 16.87% | 18.30% | 24.52% | -17.73% | 6.44% |
TTAC TrimTabs US Free Cash Flow Quality ETF | 17.95% | 8.07% | 18.26% | 22.97% | -14.60% | 30.66% | 18.30% | 26.03% | -6.26% | 15.23% |
Correlation
The correlation between TTAI and TTAC is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 25, 2017 | 0.71 |
The correlation between TTAI and TTAC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.
TTAI vs. TTAC - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
TTAI
TTAC
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Financial Services
Communication Services
Basic Materials
Energy
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
TTAI
TTAC
Consumer Cyclical
TTAI
TTAC
Healthcare
TTAI
TTAC
Industrials
TTAI
TTAC
Consumer Defensive
TTAI
TTAC
Financial Services
TTAI
TTAC
Communication Services
TTAI
TTAC
Basic Materials
TTAI
TTAC
Energy
TTAI
TTAC
Utilities
TTAI
TTAC
-
Real Estate
TTAI
-
TTAC
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TTAI vs. TTAC — Risk / Return Rank
TTAI
TTAC
TTAI vs. TTAC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TrimTabs International Free Cash Flow Quality ETF of Benef Interest (TTAI) and TrimTabs US Free Cash Flow Quality ETF (TTAC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TTAI | TTAC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.87 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.09 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | 1.24 | -0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.64 | 2.89 | -2.26 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.27 | 9.37 | -7.11 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TTAI | TTAC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.49 | 1.36 | -0.87 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.10 | 0.75 | -0.65 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.29 | 0.79 | -0.50 |
Drawdowns
TTAI vs. TTAC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TTAI drawdown since its inception was -34.17%, roughly equal to the maximum TTAC drawdown of -34.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TTAI and TTAC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TTAI | TTAC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.17% | -34.95% | +0.78% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.00% | -7.17% | -5.83% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.34% | -19.92% | -1.42% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.13% | -21.88% | -12.25% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.51% | 0.00% | -1.51% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.20% | -4.98% | -4.22% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.66% | 2.21% | +1.45% |
Volatility
TTAI vs. TTAC - Volatility Comparison
TrimTabs International Free Cash Flow Quality ETF of Benef Interest (TTAI) has a higher volatility of 5.92% compared to TrimTabs US Free Cash Flow Quality ETF (TTAC) at 4.02%. This indicates that TTAI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TTAC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TTAI | TTAC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.92% | 4.02% | +1.90% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.17% | 11.70% | +2.47% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.02% | 15.31% | +1.71% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.92% | 17.09% | -0.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.89% | 18.71% | +0.18% |
TTAI vs. TTAC - Expense Ratio Comparison
TTAI has a 0.61% expense ratio, which is higher than TTAC's 0.59% expense ratio.
Dividends
TTAI vs. TTAC - Dividend Comparison
TTAI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.45%, more than TTAC's 0.53% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TTAC TrimTabs US Free Cash Flow Quality ETF | 0.53% | 0.62% | 0.70% | 0.94% | 1.36% | 9.63% | 0.41% | 0.72% | 0.62% | 0.40% |
TTAI TrimTabs International Free Cash Flow Quality ETF of Benef Interest | 2.45% | 2.30% | 2.13% | 2.39% | 9.36% | 2.01% | 0.64% | 1.90% | 0.92% | 0.26% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TTAI and TTAC have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TTAI has higher volatility (5.92%) compared to TTAC (4.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TTAI dropped -34.17% vs TTAC's -34.95%.
On 5-year performance, TTAC leads with 12.83% vs 1.76% for TTAI. On fees, TTAC is cheaper at 0.59% per year. On volatility, TTAC has been the lower-risk option at 4.02%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, TTAC has performed better with a 12.83% return vs 1.76%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TTAC is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.61% for TTAI.
TTAI has the higher dividend yield at 2.45%, compared with 0.53% for TTAC.
TTAI is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while TTAC is Large Cap Growth Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.61% for TTAI and 0.59% for TTAC.
TTAC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.36 vs 0.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TTAI and TTAC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer