PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TTAI vs. FFHCX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TTAI vs. FFHCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TrimTabs International Free Cash Flow Quality ETF of Benef Interest (TTAI) and Fidelity Series Floating Rate High Income Fund (FFHCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TTAI achieves a -2.27% return, which is significantly lower than FFHCX's 2.37% return.


TTAI

1D
-0.25%
1M
-3.63%
6M
-4.25%
YTD
-2.27%
1Y
7.33%
3Y*
5.67%
5Y*
0.36%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
4.69%

FFHCX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.12%
6M
2.17%
YTD
2.37%
1Y
5.43%
3Y*
7.34%
5Y*
6.11%
10Y*
5.57%
ALL TIME*
5.14%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$13.59K$35.24K$47.06K

TTAI vs. FFHCX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TTAI
TrimTabs International Free Cash Flow Quality ETF of Benef Interest
-2.27%13.27%0.39%18.22%-24.37%16.87%18.30%24.52%-17.73%7.78%
FFHCX
Fidelity Series Floating Rate High Income Fund
2.37%6.02%8.49%13.19%-1.55%5.66%2.54%9.42%1.36%3.13%

Correlation

The correlation between TTAI and FFHCX is 0.30, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.30

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.26

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.33

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 28, 2017

0.31

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TTAI vs. FFHCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

TTAI
TTAI Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
TTAI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TTAI Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
TTAI Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
TTAI Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
TTAI Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank

FFHCX
FFHCX Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
FFHCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FFHCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
FFHCX Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
FFHCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
FFHCX Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

TTAI vs. FFHCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TrimTabs International Free Cash Flow Quality ETF of Benef Interest (TTAI) and Fidelity Series Floating Rate High Income Fund (FFHCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TTAIFFHCXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.97

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.99

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.07

1.80

-0.73

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.47

5.21

-4.74

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.53

17.59

-16.06

TTAI vs. FFHCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TTAI Sharpe Ratio is 0.32, which is lower than the FFHCX Sharpe Ratio of 2.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TTAI and FFHCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TTAI vs. FFHCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TTAI drawdown since its inception was -34.17%, which is greater than FFHCX's maximum drawdown of -21.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TTAI and FFHCX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TTAIFFHCXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.17%

-21.45%

-12.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.00%

-1.14%

-11.86%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.34%

-3.12%

-18.22%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.13%

-5.81%

-28.32%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-21.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.52%

-0.11%

-8.41%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.13%

-0.92%

-8.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.02%

0.34%

+3.68%

Volatility

TTAI vs. FFHCX - Volatility Comparison

TrimTabs International Free Cash Flow Quality ETF of Benef Interest (TTAI) has a higher volatility of 6.51% compared to Fidelity Series Floating Rate High Income Fund (FFHCX) at 0.33%. This indicates that TTAI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FFHCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TTAIFFHCXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.51%

0.33%

+6.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.29%

1.90%

+15.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.63%

2.60%

+17.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.50%

3.11%

+14.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.07%

4.17%

+14.90%

TTAI vs. FFHCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TTAI has a 0.61% expense ratio, which is higher than FFHCX's 0.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

TTAI vs. FFHCX - Dividend Comparison

TTAI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.48%, less than FFHCX's 6.91% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FFHCX
Fidelity Series Floating Rate High Income Fund
6.91%8.11%8.46%9.47%3.83%3.64%4.61%5.92%6.68%4.80%5.16%4.37%
TTAI
TrimTabs International Free Cash Flow Quality ETF of Benef Interest
2.48%2.30%2.13%2.39%9.36%2.01%0.64%1.90%0.92%0.26%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


TTAI and FFHCX have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TTAI has higher volatility (6.51%) compared to FFHCX (0.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TTAI dropped -34.17% vs FFHCX's -21.45%.

FFHCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.29 vs 0.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TTAI and FFHCX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer