PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TTAI vs. IPOS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TTAI vs. IPOS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TrimTabs International Free Cash Flow Quality ETF of Benef Interest (TTAI) and Renaissance International IPO ETF (IPOS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TTAI achieves a 3.82% return, which is significantly lower than IPOS's 38.58% return.


TTAI

1D
-0.18%
1M
1.51%
YTD
3.82%
6M
3.76%
1Y
8.28%
3Y*
9.76%
5Y*
1.76%
10Y*

IPOS

1D
-1.12%
1M
8.92%
YTD
38.58%
6M
41.43%
1Y
61.03%
3Y*
15.07%
5Y*
-7.90%
10Y*
2.73%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TTAI vs. IPOS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TTAI
TrimTabs International Free Cash Flow Quality ETF of Benef Interest
3.82%13.27%0.39%18.22%-24.37%16.87%18.30%24.52%-17.73%7.27%
IPOS
Renaissance International IPO ETF
38.58%39.93%-12.34%-16.49%-33.46%-30.62%50.71%30.93%-22.33%16.88%

Correlation

The correlation between TTAI and IPOS is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.54

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.62

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 29, 2017

0.60

The correlation between TTAI and IPOS shifts across timeframes, from 0.54 (1 year) to 0.66 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

TTAI vs. IPOS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
TTAI
IPOS

Technology

34.4%
42.0%

Consumer Cyclical

15.2%
7.1%

Healthcare

14.8%
16.2%

Industrials

11.1%
15.0%

Consumer Defensive

7.2%
4.7%

Financial Services

6.2%
9.6%

Communication Services

5.8%
0.3%

Basic Materials

2.4%
5.3%

Energy

1.9%
4.9%

Utilities

1.2%
3.1%

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

TTAI
34.4%
IPOS
42.0%

Consumer Cyclical

TTAI
15.2%
IPOS
7.1%

Healthcare

TTAI
14.8%
IPOS
16.2%

Industrials

TTAI
11.1%
IPOS
15.0%

Consumer Defensive

TTAI
7.2%
IPOS
4.7%

Financial Services

TTAI
6.2%
IPOS
9.6%

Communication Services

TTAI
5.8%
IPOS
0.3%

Basic Materials

TTAI
2.4%
IPOS
5.3%

Energy

TTAI
1.9%
IPOS
4.9%

Utilities

TTAI
1.2%
IPOS
3.1%

Real Estate

TTAI

-

IPOS

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TTAI vs. IPOS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TTAI
TTAI Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
TTAI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TTAI Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
TTAI Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
TTAI Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
TTAI Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank

IPOS
IPOS Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
IPOS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IPOS Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
IPOS Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
IPOS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
IPOS Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TTAI vs. IPOS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TrimTabs International Free Cash Flow Quality ETF of Benef Interest (TTAI) and Renaissance International IPO ETF (IPOS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TTAIIPOSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.60

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.80

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

1.38

-0.29

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.64

3.57

-2.93

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.27

10.79

-8.52

TTAI vs. IPOS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TTAI Sharpe Ratio is 0.49, which is lower than the IPOS Sharpe Ratio of 2.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TTAI and IPOS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TTAIIPOSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.49

2.09

-1.60

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.10

-0.29

+0.40

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.11

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.29

0.09

+0.20

Drawdowns

TTAI vs. IPOS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TTAI drawdown since its inception was -34.17%, smaller than the maximum IPOS drawdown of -73.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TTAI and IPOS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TTAIIPOSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.17%

-73.09%

+38.92%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.00%

-17.17%

+4.17%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.34%

-34.08%

+12.74%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.13%

-69.93%

+35.80%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-73.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.51%

-41.11%

+39.60%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.20%

-31.99%

+22.79%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.66%

5.67%

-2.01%

Volatility

TTAI vs. IPOS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for TrimTabs International Free Cash Flow Quality ETF of Benef Interest (TTAI) is 5.92%, while Renaissance International IPO ETF (IPOS) has a volatility of 12.16%. This indicates that TTAI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IPOS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TTAIIPOSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.92%

12.16%

-6.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.17%

26.48%

-12.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.02%

29.43%

-12.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.92%

27.20%

-10.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.89%

24.12%

-5.23%

TTAI vs. IPOS - Expense Ratio Comparison

TTAI has a 0.61% expense ratio, which is lower than IPOS's 0.80% expense ratio.


Dividends

TTAI vs. IPOS - Dividend Comparison

TTAI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.45%, more than IPOS's 0.69% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IPOS
Renaissance International IPO ETF
0.69%1.04%0.93%0.33%0.00%0.00%0.25%0.89%1.12%0.87%1.73%1.08%
TTAI
TrimTabs International Free Cash Flow Quality ETF of Benef Interest
2.45%2.30%2.13%2.39%9.36%2.01%0.64%1.90%0.92%0.26%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


TTAI and IPOS have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IPOS has higher volatility (12.16%) compared to TTAI (5.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TTAI dropped -34.17% vs IPOS's -73.09%.

On 5-year performance, TTAI leads with 1.76% vs -7.90% for IPOS. On fees, TTAI is cheaper at 0.61% per year. On volatility, TTAI has been the lower-risk option at 5.92%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, TTAI has performed better with a 1.76% return vs -7.90%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TTAI is cheaper with a 0.61% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for IPOS.

TTAI has the higher dividend yield at 2.45%, compared with 0.69% for IPOS.

They also come from different issuers: TrimTabs and Renaissance Capital. Their fees differ too: 0.61% for TTAI and 0.80% for IPOS.

IPOS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.09 vs 0.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TTAI and IPOS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer