TTAI vs. DFNV
TTAI (TrimTabs International Free Cash Flow Quality ETF of Benef Interest) and DFNV (TrimTabs Donoghue Forlines Risk Managed Innovation ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TTAI is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund actively managed by TrimTabs, while DFNV is a Technology Equities fund tracking the TrimTabs Donoghue Forlines Risk Managed Free Cash Flow Innovation Index. TTAI is actively managed, while DFNV is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, TTAI returned 1.92%/yr vs 6.95%/yr for DFNV. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TTAI charges 0.61%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for DFNV.
Performance
TTAI vs. DFNV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TTAI achieves a 4.43% return, which is significantly higher than DFNV's -5.42% return.
TTAI
- 1D
- 1.72%
- 1M
- 0.38%
- YTD
- 4.43%
- 6M
- 3.52%
- 1Y
- 9.01%
- 3Y*
- 9.54%
- 5Y*
- 1.92%
- 10Y*
- —
DFNV
- 1D
- -1.40%
- 1M
- -5.37%
- YTD
- -5.42%
- 6M
- -7.32%
- 1Y
- -2.22%
- 3Y*
- 15.62%
- 5Y*
- 6.95%
- 10Y*
- —
TTAI vs. DFNV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TTAI TrimTabs International Free Cash Flow Quality ETF of Benef Interest | 4.43% | 13.27% | 0.39% | 18.22% | -24.37% | 16.87% | 3.97% |
DFNV TrimTabs Donoghue Forlines Risk Managed Innovation ETF | -5.42% | 8.42% | 31.93% | 26.92% | -24.05% | 18.51% | 3.29% |
Correlation
The correlation between TTAI and DFNV is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 8, 2020 | 0.66 |
The correlation between TTAI and DFNV shifts across timeframes, from 0.52 (1 year) to 0.66 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
TTAI vs. DFNV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
TTAI
DFNV
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
-
Financial Services
-
Communication Services
Basic Materials
-
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
TTAI
DFNV
Consumer Cyclical
TTAI
DFNV
Healthcare
TTAI
DFNV
Industrials
TTAI
DFNV
Consumer Defensive
TTAI
DFNV
-
Financial Services
TTAI
DFNV
-
Communication Services
TTAI
DFNV
Basic Materials
TTAI
DFNV
-
Energy
TTAI
DFNV
-
Utilities
TTAI
DFNV
-
Real Estate
TTAI
-
DFNV
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TTAI vs. DFNV — Risk / Return Rank
TTAI
DFNV
TTAI vs. DFNV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TrimTabs International Free Cash Flow Quality ETF of Benef Interest (TTAI) and TrimTabs Donoghue Forlines Risk Managed Innovation ETF (DFNV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TTAI | DFNV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.61 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.86 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | 0.99 | +0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.70 | -0.10 | +0.80 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.40 | -0.24 | +2.64 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TTAI vs. DFNV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TTAI drawdown since its inception was -34.17%, which is greater than DFNV's maximum drawdown of -29.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TTAI and DFNV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TTAI | DFNV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.17% | -29.71% | -4.46% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.00% | -21.54% | +8.54% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.34% | -22.72% | +1.38% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.13% | -29.71% | -4.42% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.25% | -11.76% | +9.51% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.16% | -9.46% | +0.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.77% | 9.18% | -5.41% |
Volatility
TTAI vs. DFNV - Volatility Comparison
TrimTabs International Free Cash Flow Quality ETF of Benef Interest (TTAI) has a higher volatility of 8.63% compared to TrimTabs Donoghue Forlines Risk Managed Innovation ETF (DFNV) at 7.53%. This indicates that TTAI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DFNV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TTAI | DFNV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.63% | 7.53% | +1.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.22% | 15.34% | +0.88% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.62% | 18.09% | +0.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.29% | 19.74% | -2.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.03% | 19.73% | -0.70% |
TTAI vs. DFNV - Expense Ratio Comparison
TTAI has a 0.61% expense ratio, which is lower than DFNV's 0.69% expense ratio.
Dividends
TTAI vs. DFNV - Dividend Comparison
TTAI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.44%, more than DFNV's 0.40% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFNV TrimTabs Donoghue Forlines Risk Managed Innovation ETF | 0.40% | 0.38% | 1.28% | 0.77% | 1.20% | 4.77% | 0.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TTAI TrimTabs International Free Cash Flow Quality ETF of Benef Interest | 2.44% | 2.30% | 2.13% | 2.39% | 9.36% | 2.01% | 0.64% | 1.90% | 0.92% | 0.26% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TTAI and DFNV have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TTAI has higher volatility (8.63%) compared to DFNV (7.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TTAI dropped -34.17% vs DFNV's -29.71%.
On 5-year performance, DFNV leads with 6.95% vs 1.92% for TTAI. On fees, TTAI is cheaper at 0.61% per year. On volatility, DFNV has been the lower-risk option at 7.53%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, DFNV has performed better with a 6.95% return vs 1.92%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TTAI is cheaper with a 0.61% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for DFNV.
TTAI has the higher dividend yield at 2.44%, compared with 0.40% for DFNV.
TTAI is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while DFNV is Technology Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.61% for TTAI and 0.69% for DFNV.
TTAI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.49 vs -0.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TTAI and DFNV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer