TTAC vs. TTAI
TTAC (TrimTabs US Free Cash Flow Quality ETF) and TTAI (TrimTabs International Free Cash Flow Quality ETF of Benef Interest) are both exchange-traded funds - TTAC is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by TrimTabs, while TTAI is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund actively managed by TrimTabs. Both are actively managed. Over the past 5 years, TTAC returned 12.77%/yr vs 1.80%/yr for TTAI. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TTAC charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.61%/yr for TTAI.
Performance
TTAC vs. TTAI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TTAC achieves a 17.63% return, which is significantly higher than TTAI's 4.01% return.
TTAC
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 6.04%
- YTD
- 17.63%
- 6M
- 17.18%
- 1Y
- 20.72%
- 3Y*
- 19.01%
- 5Y*
- 12.77%
- 10Y*
- —
TTAI
- 1D
- -0.49%
- 1M
- 3.53%
- YTD
- 4.01%
- 6M
- 3.75%
- 1Y
- 9.23%
- 3Y*
- 9.61%
- 5Y*
- 1.80%
- 10Y*
- —
TTAC vs. TTAI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TTAC TrimTabs US Free Cash Flow Quality ETF | 17.63% | 8.07% | 18.26% | 22.97% | -14.60% | 30.66% | 18.30% | 26.03% | -6.26% | 15.23% |
TTAI TrimTabs International Free Cash Flow Quality ETF of Benef Interest | 4.01% | 13.27% | 0.39% | 18.22% | -24.37% | 16.87% | 18.30% | 24.52% | -17.73% | 6.44% |
Correlation
The correlation between TTAC and TTAI is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 25, 2017 | 0.71 |
The correlation between TTAC and TTAI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.
TTAC vs. TTAI - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
TTAC
TTAI
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Energy
Basic Materials
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Technology
TTAC
TTAI
Financial Services
TTAC
TTAI
Consumer Cyclical
TTAC
TTAI
Healthcare
TTAC
TTAI
Industrials
TTAC
TTAI
Consumer Defensive
TTAC
TTAI
Communication Services
TTAC
TTAI
Energy
TTAC
TTAI
Basic Materials
TTAC
TTAI
Real Estate
TTAC
TTAI
-
Utilities
TTAC
-
TTAI
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TTAC vs. TTAI — Risk / Return Rank
TTAC
TTAI
TTAC vs. TTAI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TrimTabs US Free Cash Flow Quality ETF (TTAC) and TrimTabs International Free Cash Flow Quality ETF of Benef Interest (TTAI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TTAC | TTAI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.82 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.02 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.11 | +0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.90 | 0.71 | +2.19 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.41 | 2.53 | +6.88 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TTAC | TTAI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.36 | 0.54 | +0.82 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.75 | 0.11 | +0.64 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.79 | 0.29 | +0.50 |
Drawdowns
TTAC vs. TTAI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TTAC drawdown since its inception was -34.95%, roughly equal to the maximum TTAI drawdown of -34.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TTAC and TTAI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TTAC | TTAI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.95% | -34.17% | -0.78% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.17% | -13.00% | +5.83% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.92% | -21.34% | +1.42% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.88% | -34.13% | +12.25% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -1.32% | +1.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.99% | -9.21% | +4.22% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.21% | 3.66% | -1.45% |
Volatility
TTAC vs. TTAI - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for TrimTabs US Free Cash Flow Quality ETF (TTAC) is 4.48%, while TrimTabs International Free Cash Flow Quality ETF of Benef Interest (TTAI) has a volatility of 6.15%. This indicates that TTAC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TTAI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TTAC | TTAI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.48% | 6.15% | -1.67% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.70% | 14.17% | -2.47% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.31% | 17.02% | -1.71% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.09% | 16.92% | +0.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.71% | 18.89% | -0.18% |
TTAC vs. TTAI - Expense Ratio Comparison
TTAC has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than TTAI's 0.61% expense ratio.
Dividends
TTAC vs. TTAI - Dividend Comparison
TTAC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.53%, less than TTAI's 2.45% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TTAC TrimTabs US Free Cash Flow Quality ETF | 0.53% | 0.62% | 0.70% | 0.94% | 1.36% | 9.63% | 0.41% | 0.72% | 0.62% | 0.40% |
TTAI TrimTabs International Free Cash Flow Quality ETF of Benef Interest | 2.45% | 2.30% | 2.13% | 2.39% | 9.36% | 2.01% | 0.64% | 1.90% | 0.92% | 0.26% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TTAC and TTAI have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TTAI has higher volatility (6.15%) compared to TTAC (4.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TTAC dropped -34.95% vs TTAI's -34.17%.
On 5-year performance, TTAC leads with 12.77% vs 1.80% for TTAI. On fees, TTAC is cheaper at 0.59% per year. On volatility, TTAC has been the lower-risk option at 4.48%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, TTAC has performed better with a 12.77% return vs 1.80%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TTAC is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.61% for TTAI.
TTAI has the higher dividend yield at 2.45%, compared with 0.53% for TTAC.
TTAC is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while TTAI is Foreign Large Cap Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for TTAC and 0.61% for TTAI.
TTAC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.36 vs 0.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TTAC and TTAI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer