PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TTAC vs. DFNV
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

TTAC vs. DFNV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TrimTabs US Free Cash Flow Quality ETF (TTAC) and TrimTabs Donoghue Forlines Risk Managed Innovation ETF (DFNV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

TTAC vs. DFNV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
TTAC
TrimTabs US Free Cash Flow Quality ETF
-0.10%8.07%18.26%22.97%-14.60%30.66%2.75%
DFNV
TrimTabs Donoghue Forlines Risk Managed Innovation ETF
-15.04%8.42%31.93%26.92%-24.05%18.51%2.92%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TTAC achieves a -0.10% return, which is significantly higher than DFNV's -15.04% return.


TTAC

1D
3.03%
1M
-3.07%
YTD
-0.10%
6M
-0.80%
1Y
12.02%
3Y*
14.18%
5Y*
10.27%
10Y*

DFNV

1D
2.55%
1M
-3.84%
YTD
-15.04%
6M
-17.93%
1Y
-2.08%
3Y*
13.16%
5Y*
6.22%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


TTAC vs. DFNV - Expense Ratio Comparison

TTAC has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than DFNV's 0.69% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

TTAC vs. DFNV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TTAC
TTAC Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
TTAC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TTAC Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
TTAC Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
TTAC Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
TTAC Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank

DFNV
DFNV Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
DFNV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFNV Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFNV Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
DFNV Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFNV Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TTAC vs. DFNV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TrimTabs US Free Cash Flow Quality ETF (TTAC) and TrimTabs Donoghue Forlines Risk Managed Innovation ETF (DFNV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TTACDFNVDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.61

-0.10

+0.71

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.98

0.01

+0.96

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.00

+0.13

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.01

-0.10

+1.11

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.45

-0.29

+4.73

TTAC vs. DFNV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TTAC Sharpe Ratio is 0.61, which is higher than the DFNV Sharpe Ratio of -0.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TTAC and DFNV, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TTACDFNVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.61

-0.10

+0.71

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

0.32

+0.29

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.69

0.36

+0.33

Correlation

The correlation between TTAC and DFNV is 0.87, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

TTAC vs. DFNV - Dividend Comparison

TTAC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.63%, more than DFNV's 0.44% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
TTAC
TrimTabs US Free Cash Flow Quality ETF
0.63%0.62%0.70%0.94%1.36%9.63%0.41%0.72%0.62%0.40%
DFNV
TrimTabs Donoghue Forlines Risk Managed Innovation ETF
0.44%0.38%1.28%0.77%1.20%4.77%0.02%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

TTAC vs. DFNV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TTAC drawdown since its inception was -34.95%, which is greater than DFNV's maximum drawdown of -29.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TTAC and DFNV.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


TTACDFNVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.95%

-29.71%

-5.24%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.12%

-21.54%

+9.42%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.88%

-29.71%

+7.83%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.31%

-18.92%

+14.61%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.07%

-9.41%

+4.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.75%

7.45%

-4.70%

Volatility

TTAC vs. DFNV - Volatility Comparison

TrimTabs US Free Cash Flow Quality ETF (TTAC) and TrimTabs Donoghue Forlines Risk Managed Innovation ETF (DFNV) have volatilities of 6.40% and 6.11%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


TTACDFNVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.40%

6.11%

+0.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.07%

13.00%

-0.93%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.81%

21.67%

-1.86%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.00%

19.44%

-2.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.77%

19.64%

-0.87%