TSYW vs. UBT
TSYW (Roundhill Treasury Bond WeeklyPay ETF) and UBT (ProShares Ultra 20+ Year Treasury) are both Leveraged Bonds funds. TSYW is actively managed, while UBT is passively managed. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. TSYW charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for UBT.
Performance
TSYW vs. UBT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TSYW achieves a -3.24% return, which is significantly higher than UBT's -4.25% return.
TSYW
- 1D
- -0.09%
- 1M
- -1.54%
- 6M
- -3.84%
- YTD
- -3.24%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
UBT
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -2.27%
- 6M
- -5.90%
- YTD
- -4.25%
- 1Y
- 0.81%
- 3Y*
- -9.31%
- 5Y*
- -19.77%
- 10Y*
- -9.36%
TSYW vs. UBT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
TSYW Roundhill Treasury Bond WeeklyPay ETF | -3.24% | -3.37% |
UBT ProShares Ultra 20+ Year Treasury | -4.25% | -5.84% |
Correlation
The correlation between TSYW and UBT is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 13, 2025 | 0.96 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TSYW vs. UBT — Risk / Return Rank
TSYW
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
UBT
TSYW vs. UBT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Treasury Bond WeeklyPay ETF (TSYW) and ProShares Ultra 20+ Year Treasury (UBT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TSYW | UBT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.00 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | -0.12 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | -0.26 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TSYW vs. UBT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TSYW drawdown since its inception was -9.79%, smaller than the maximum UBT drawdown of -78.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSYW and UBT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TSYW | UBT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -9.79% | -78.90% | +69.11% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -16.86% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -35.81% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -72.49% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -78.90% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.56% | -77.03% | +69.47% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.29% | -32.56% | +28.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 7.71% | — |
Volatility
TSYW vs. UBT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TSYW | UBT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 5.85% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 13.46% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.90% | 18.88% | -7.98% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.90% | 31.19% | -20.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.90% | 29.21% | -18.31% |
TSYW vs. UBT - Expense Ratio Comparison
TSYW has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than UBT's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
TSYW vs. UBT - Dividend Comparison
TSYW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.92%, more than UBT's 3.58% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TSYW Roundhill Treasury Bond WeeklyPay ETF | 8.92% | 1.63% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
UBT ProShares Ultra 20+ Year Treasury | 3.58% | 4.26% | 4.50% | 3.54% | 0.30% | 0.00% | 0.26% | 1.50% | 1.55% | 1.37% | 0.75% | 1.56% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.96, TSYW and UBT move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, UBT is cheaper at 0.95% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
UBT is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for TSYW.
TSYW has the higher dividend yield at 8.92%, compared with 3.58% for UBT.
They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for TSYW and 0.95% for UBT.
Find the right allocation for TSYW and UBT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer