TSMU vs. PLTM

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

TSMU (GraniteShares 2x Long TSM Daily ETF) and PLTM (GraniteShares Platinum Trust) are both exchange-traded funds - TSMU is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by GraniteShares, while PLTM is a Precious Metals fund tracking the Platinum London PM Fix ($/ozt). TSMU is actively managed, while PLTM is passively managed. Over the past year, TSMU returned 302.06% vs 80.23% for PLTM. At a 0.22 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TSMU charges 1.50%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for PLTM.

Performance

TSMU vs. PLTM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares 2x Long TSM Daily ETF (TSMU) and GraniteShares Platinum Trust (PLTM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TSMU achieves a 90.07% return, which is significantly higher than PLTM's -5.73% return.

TSMU

• 1D: 4.32%
• 1M: 22.68%
• YTD: 90.07%
• 6M: 102.38%
• 1Y: 302.06%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

PLTM

• 1D: 0.59%
• 1M: -2.41%
• YTD: -5.73%
• 6M: 17.72%
• 1Y: 80.23%
• 3Y*: 23.81%
• 5Y*: 10.16%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TSMU vs. PLTM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
TSMU GraniteShares 2x Long TSM Daily ETF	90.07%	74.83%	3.04%
PLTM GraniteShares Platinum Trust	-5.73%	124.46%	-4.34%

Correlation

The correlation between TSMU and PLTM is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.25
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 13, 2024	0.22

TSMU vs. PLTM - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	TSMU	PLTM
Technology	66.6%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	-
Real Estate	-	100.0%
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

TSMU vs. PLTM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TSMU

TSMU Risk / Return Rank: 89
TSMU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
TSMU Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
TSMU Omega Ratio Rank: 76
TSMU Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
TSMU Martin Ratio Rank: 94

PLTM

PLTM Risk / Return Rank: 41
PLTM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 45
PLTM Sortino Ratio Rank: 37
PLTM Omega Ratio Rank: 43
PLTM Calmar Ratio Rank: 48
PLTM Martin Ratio Rank: 33

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TSMU vs. PLTM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Long TSM Daily ETF (TSMU) and GraniteShares Platinum Trust (PLTM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	TSMU	PLTM	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	4.28	1.57	+2.70
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.83	1.93	+1.89
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.46	1.28	+0.18
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	8.85	2.38	+6.47
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	28.75	5.09	+23.66
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

TSMU vs. PLTM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TSMU Sharpe Ratio is 4.28, which is higher than the PLTM Sharpe Ratio of 1.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TSMU and PLTM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TSMU	PLTM	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.28	1.57	+2.70
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.31	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.53	0.25	+1.28

Drawdowns

TSMU vs. PLTM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TSMU drawdown since its inception was -63.73%, which is greater than PLTM's maximum drawdown of -42.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSMU and PLTM.

Drawdown Indicators

	TSMU	PLTM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-63.73%	-42.32%	-21.41%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-35.18%	-34.52%	-0.66%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-34.52%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-34.52%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-30.36%	+30.36%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-16.04%	-18.54%	+2.50%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	10.83%	16.14%	-5.31%

Volatility

TSMU vs. PLTM - Volatility Comparison

GraniteShares 2x Long TSM Daily ETF (TSMU) has a higher volatility of 22.07% compared to GraniteShares Platinum Trust (PLTM) at 10.35%. This indicates that TSMU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PLTM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TSMU	PLTM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	22.07%	10.35%	+11.72%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	54.04%	45.30%	+8.74%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	71.13%	51.24%	+19.89%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	80.48%	32.80%	+47.68%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	80.48%	30.96%	+49.52%

TSMU vs. PLTM - Expense Ratio Comparison

TSMU has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than PLTM's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

TSMU vs. PLTM - Dividend Comparison

Neither TSMU nor PLTM has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TSMU and PLTM in my portfolio?

TSMU and PLTM have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TSMU or PLTM?

TSMU has higher volatility (22.07%) compared to PLTM (10.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TSMU dropped -63.73% vs PLTM's -42.32%.

Which ETF is better, TSMU or PLTM?

On 1-year performance, TSMU leads with 302.06% vs 80.23% for PLTM. On fees, PLTM is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, PLTM has been the lower-risk option at 10.35%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, TSMU or PLTM?

Over the 1-year period, TSMU has performed better with a 302.06% return vs 80.23%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, TSMU or PLTM?

PLTM is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for TSMU.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TSMU or PLTM?

TSMU and PLTM have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between TSMU and PLTM?

TSMU is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while PLTM is Precious Metals. Their fees differ too: 1.50% for TSMU and 0.50% for PLTM.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

TSMU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.28 vs 1.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.