TSMU vs. TSMG

Last updated Aug 5, 2026

TSMU (GraniteShares 2x Long TSM Daily ETF) and TSMG (Leverage Shares 2X Long TSM Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, TSMU returned 125.04% vs 136.43% for TSMG. Their 0.99 correlation means they have historically moved very closely together. TSMU charges 1.50%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for TSMG.

Performance

TSMU vs. TSMG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares 2x Long TSM Daily ETF (TSMU) and Leverage Shares 2X Long TSM Daily ETF (TSMG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TSMU achieves a 53.76% return, which is significantly lower than TSMG's 58.23% return.

TSMU

• 1D: 5.04%
• 1M: -10.89%
• 6M: 28.86%
• YTD: 53.76%
• 1Y: 125.04%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 81.04%

TSMG

• 1D: 5.47%
• 1M: -10.36%
• 6M: 32.51%
• YTD: 58.23%
• 1Y: 136.43%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 89.90%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
TSMG Leverage Shares 2X Long TSM Daily ETF	$3.38M	$4.42M	$4.30M
TSMU GraniteShares 2x Long TSM Daily ETF	$4.96M	$6.75M	$6.72M

TSMU vs. TSMG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
TSMU GraniteShares 2x Long TSM Daily ETF	53.76%	71.01%
TSMG Leverage Shares 2X Long TSM Daily ETF	58.23%	71.03%

Correlation

The correlation between TSMU and TSMG is 1.00 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	1.00
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 14, 2025	0.99

The correlation between TSMU and TSMG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.99 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

TSMU vs. TSMG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

TSMU

TSMU Risk / Return Rank: 61
TSMU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
TSMU Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
TSMU Omega Ratio Rank: 51
TSMU Calmar Ratio Rank: 78
TSMU Martin Ratio Rank: 67

TSMG

TSMG Risk / Return Rank: 67
TSMG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
TSMG Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
TSMG Omega Ratio Rank: 54
TSMG Calmar Ratio Rank: 83
TSMG Martin Ratio Rank: 73

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

TSMU vs. TSMG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Long TSM Daily ETF (TSMU) and Leverage Shares 2X Long TSM Daily ETF (TSMG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	TSMU	TSMG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.54	1.67	-0.13
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.18	2.27	-0.09
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.26	1.27	-0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.09	3.40	-0.31
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.25	10.14	-0.89

TSMU vs. TSMG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TSMU Sharpe Ratio is 1.54, which is comparable to the TSMG Sharpe Ratio of 1.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TSMU and TSMG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

TSMU vs. TSMG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TSMU drawdown since its inception was -63.73%, roughly equal to the maximum TSMG drawdown of -63.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSMU and TSMG.

Drawdown Indicators

	TSMU	TSMG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-63.73%	-63.67%	-0.06%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-40.67%	-40.36%	-0.31%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-26.91%	-26.24%	-0.67%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-16.19%	-17.07%	+0.88%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	13.57%	13.51%	+0.06%

Volatility

TSMU vs. TSMG - Volatility Comparison

GraniteShares 2x Long TSM Daily ETF (TSMU) and Leverage Shares 2X Long TSM Daily ETF (TSMG) have volatilities of 27.02% and 27.35%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TSMU	TSMG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	27.02%	27.35%	-0.33%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	65.89%	66.82%	-0.93%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	81.57%	82.31%	-0.74%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	83.96%	85.01%	-1.05%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	83.96%	85.01%	-1.05%

TSMU vs. TSMG - Expense Ratio Comparison

TSMU has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than TSMG's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

TSMU vs. TSMG - Dividend Comparison

TSMU has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TSMG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.26%.

Position	TTM	2025
TSMG Leverage Shares 2X Long TSM Daily ETF	7.26%	11.48%
TSMU GraniteShares 2x Long TSM Daily ETF	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TSMU and TSMG in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 1.00, TSMU and TSMG move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, TSMU or TSMG?

TSMG has higher volatility (27.35%) compared to TSMU (27.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TSMU dropped -63.73% vs TSMG's -63.67%.

Which ETF is better, TSMU or TSMG?

On 1-year performance, TSMG leads with 136.43% vs 125.04% for TSMU. On fees, TSMG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, TSMU has been the lower-risk option at 27.02%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, TSMU or TSMG?

Over the 1-year period, TSMG has performed better with a 136.43% return vs 125.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, TSMU or TSMG?

TSMG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for TSMU.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TSMU or TSMG?

TSMG has the higher dividend yield at 7.26%, compared with 0.00% for TSMU.

What is the main difference between TSMU and TSMG?

They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.50% for TSMU and 0.75% for TSMG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

TSMG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.67 vs 1.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.