TSMU vs. FDL
TSMU (GraniteShares 2x Long TSM Daily ETF) and FDL (First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - TSMU is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by GraniteShares, while FDL is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index. TSMU is actively managed, while FDL is passively managed. Over the past year, TSMU returned 118.59% vs 27.65% for FDL. Their -0.07 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. TSMU charges 1.50%/yr vs 0.43%/yr for FDL.
Performance
TSMU vs. FDL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TSMU achieves a 45.22% return, which is significantly higher than FDL's 18.16% return.
TSMU
- 1D
- 0.37%
- 1M
- -15.84%
- 6M
- 25.27%
- YTD
- 45.22%
- 1Y
- 118.59%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 75.77%
FDL
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 3.27%
- 6M
- 9.50%
- YTD
- 18.16%
- 1Y
- 27.65%
- 3Y*
- 18.28%
- 5Y*
- 13.98%
- 10Y*
- 11.09%
- ALL TIME*
- 8.94%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $52.24M | $50.06M | $42.95M | |
| $5.79M | $7.14M | $6.95M |
TSMU vs. FDL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
TSMU GraniteShares 2x Long TSM Daily ETF | 45.22% | 74.83% | 3.55% |
FDL First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund | 18.16% | 14.79% | -2.83% |
Correlation
The correlation between TSMU and FDL is -0.21, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.21 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 12, 2024 | -0.07 |
The correlation between TSMU and FDL shifts across timeframes, from -0.21 (1 year) to -0.07 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
TSMU vs. FDL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
TSMU
FDL
Technology
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
Technology
TSMU
FDL
Basic Materials
TSMU
-
FDL
Communication Services
TSMU
-
FDL
Consumer Cyclical
TSMU
-
FDL
Consumer Defensive
TSMU
-
FDL
Energy
TSMU
-
FDL
Financial Services
TSMU
-
FDL
Healthcare
TSMU
-
FDL
Industrials
TSMU
-
FDL
Real Estate
TSMU
-
FDL
-
Utilities
TSMU
-
FDL
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TSMU vs. FDL — Risk / Return Rank
TSMU
FDL
TSMU vs. FDL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Long TSM Daily ETF (TSMU) and First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund (FDL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TSMU | FDL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.94 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.40 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.39 | -0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.64 | 6.29 | -3.64 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.05 | 14.86 | -6.81 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TSMU vs. FDL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TSMU drawdown since its inception was -63.73%, roughly equal to the maximum FDL drawdown of -65.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSMU and FDL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TSMU | FDL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.73% | -65.93% | +2.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -40.67% | -4.27% | -36.40% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -12.24% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -16.46% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -41.40% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -30.97% | -1.96% | -29.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.13% | -9.59% | -6.54% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.35% | 1.81% | +11.54% |
Volatility
TSMU vs. FDL - Volatility Comparison
GraniteShares 2x Long TSM Daily ETF (TSMU) has a higher volatility of 28.06% compared to First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund (FDL) at 4.96%. This indicates that TSMU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FDL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TSMU | FDL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 28.06% | 4.96% | +23.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 66.24% | 8.97% | +57.27% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 81.66% | 11.95% | +69.71% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 84.08% | 14.44% | +69.64% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 84.08% | 17.16% | +66.92% |
TSMU vs. FDL - Expense Ratio Comparison
TSMU has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than FDL's 0.43% expense ratio.
Dividends
TSMU vs. FDL - Dividend Comparison
TSMU has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FDL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.59%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDL First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund | 3.59% | 4.04% | 4.96% | 4.58% | 3.58% | 4.59% | 4.48% | 3.75% | 3.97% | 3.18% | 2.93% | 3.65% |
TSMU GraniteShares 2x Long TSM Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TSMU and FDL have a correlation of -0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TSMU has higher volatility (28.06%) compared to FDL (4.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TSMU dropped -63.73% vs FDL's -65.93%.
On 1-year performance, TSMU leads with 118.59% vs 27.65% for FDL. On fees, FDL is cheaper at 0.43% per year. On volatility, FDL has been the lower-risk option at 4.96%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, TSMU has performed better with a 118.59% return vs 27.65%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FDL is cheaper with a 0.43% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for TSMU.
FDL has the higher dividend yield at 3.59%, compared with 0.00% for TSMU.
TSMU is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while FDL is Large Cap Value Equities. They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 1.50% for TSMU and 0.43% for FDL.
FDL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.26 vs 1.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TSMU and FDL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer