TSLZ vs. QQH

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

TSLZ (T-Rex 2X Inverse Tesla Daily Target ETF) and QQH (HCM Defender 100 Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TSLZ is a Inverse Equities fund actively managed by T-Rex, while QQH is a Technology Equities fund tracking the HCM Defender 100 Index. TSLZ is actively managed, while QQH is passively managed. Over the past year, TSLZ returned -64.19% vs 40.27% for QQH. At a correlation of -0.59, they often move in opposite directions. TSLZ charges 1.05%/yr vs 1.14%/yr for QQH.

Performance

TSLZ vs. QQH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T-Rex 2X Inverse Tesla Daily Target ETF (TSLZ) and HCM Defender 100 Index ETF (QQH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TSLZ achieves a -5.69% return, which is significantly lower than QQH's 14.78% return.

TSLZ

• 1D: -0.09%
• 1M: -17.84%
• YTD: -5.69%
• 6M: -9.62%
• 1Y: -64.19%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

QQH

• 1D: -0.56%
• 1M: 14.19%
• YTD: 14.78%
• 6M: 12.39%
• 1Y: 40.27%
• 3Y*: 26.06%
• 5Y*: 15.09%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TSLZ vs. QQH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
TSLZ T-Rex 2X Inverse Tesla Daily Target ETF	-5.69%	-75.98%	-88.79%	-28.07%
QQH HCM Defender 100 Index ETF	14.78%	15.66%	33.64%	11.65%

Correlation

The correlation between TSLZ and QQH is -0.58, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.58
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 20, 2023	-0.59

The correlation between TSLZ and QQH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.59 to -0.58 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

TSLZ vs. QQH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TSLZ

TSLZ Risk / Return Rank: 3
TSLZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
TSLZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
TSLZ Omega Ratio Rank: 3
TSLZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
TSLZ Martin Ratio Rank: 4

QQH

QQH Risk / Return Rank: 51
QQH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 58
QQH Sortino Ratio Rank: 51
QQH Omega Ratio Rank: 52
QQH Calmar Ratio Rank: 50
QQH Martin Ratio Rank: 42

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TSLZ vs. QQH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-Rex 2X Inverse Tesla Daily Target ETF (TSLZ) and HCM Defender 100 Index ETF (QQH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	TSLZ	QQH	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.70	1.97	-2.67
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-0.94	2.53	-3.47
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.90	1.33	-0.43
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.84	2.50	-3.34
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-1.06	6.81	-7.87
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

TSLZ vs. QQH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TSLZ Sharpe Ratio is -0.70, which is lower than the QQH Sharpe Ratio of 1.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TSLZ and QQH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TSLZ	QQH	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.70	1.97	-2.67
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.71	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.67	0.85	-1.53

Drawdowns

TSLZ vs. QQH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TSLZ drawdown since its inception was -99.11%, which is greater than QQH's maximum drawdown of -41.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSLZ and QQH.

Drawdown Indicators

	TSLZ	QQH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-99.11%	-41.87%	-57.24%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-76.62%	-16.18%	-60.44%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-24.84%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-41.87%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-99.01%	-0.56%	-98.45%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-75.36%	-12.94%	-62.42%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	60.60%	5.93%	+54.67%

Volatility

TSLZ vs. QQH - Volatility Comparison

T-Rex 2X Inverse Tesla Daily Target ETF (TSLZ) has a higher volatility of 24.09% compared to HCM Defender 100 Index ETF (QQH) at 6.03%. This indicates that TSLZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TSLZ	QQH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	24.09%	6.03%	+18.06%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	54.94%	14.47%	+40.47%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	91.64%	20.57%	+71.07%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	117.04%	21.51%	+95.53%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	117.04%	24.73%	+92.31%

TSLZ vs. QQH - Expense Ratio Comparison

TSLZ has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is lower than QQH's 1.14% expense ratio.

Dividends

TSLZ vs. QQH - Dividend Comparison

TSLZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.73%, more than QQH's 0.18% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
QQH HCM Defender 100 Index ETF	0.18%	0.21%	0.24%	0.27%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.21%
TSLZ T-Rex 2X Inverse Tesla Daily Target ETF	0.73%	0.69%	2.08%	12.15%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TSLZ and QQH in my portfolio?

TSLZ and QQH have a correlation of -0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TSLZ or QQH?

TSLZ has higher volatility (24.09%) compared to QQH (6.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TSLZ dropped -99.11% vs QQH's -41.87%.

Which ETF is better, TSLZ or QQH?

On 1-year performance, QQH leads with 40.27% vs -64.19% for TSLZ. On fees, TSLZ is cheaper at 1.05% per year. On volatility, QQH has been the lower-risk option at 6.03%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, TSLZ or QQH?

Over the 1-year period, QQH has performed better with a 40.27% return vs -64.19%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, TSLZ or QQH?

TSLZ is cheaper with a 1.05% expense ratio, compared with 1.14% for QQH.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TSLZ or QQH?

TSLZ has the higher dividend yield at 0.73%, compared with 0.18% for QQH.

What is the main difference between TSLZ and QQH?

TSLZ is categorized as Inverse Equities, while QQH is Technology Equities. They also come from different issuers: T-Rex and Howard Capital Management. Their fees differ too: 1.05% for TSLZ and 1.14% for QQH.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QQH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.97 vs -0.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.