TSLZ vs. TSLR
TSLZ (T-Rex 2X Inverse Tesla Daily Target ETF) and TSLR (GraniteShares 2x Long TSLA Daily ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TSLZ is a Inverse Equities fund actively managed by T-Rex, while TSLR is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by GraniteShares. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, TSLZ returned -48.25% vs -24.02% for TSLR. Their -1.00 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. TSLZ charges 1.05%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for TSLR.
Performance
TSLZ vs. TSLR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TSLZ achieves a 45.39% return, which is significantly higher than TSLR's -60.77% return.
TSLZ
- 1D
- -1.43%
- 1M
- 44.35%
- 6M
- 37.89%
- YTD
- 45.39%
- 1Y
- -48.25%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -71.84%
TSLR
- 1D
- 1.45%
- 1M
- -40.45%
- 6M
- -56.28%
- YTD
- -60.77%
- 1Y
- -24.02%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -21.28%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $20.25M | $21.25M | $40.88M | |
| $39.89M | $35.72M | $42.79M |
TSLZ vs. TSLR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
TSLZ T-Rex 2X Inverse Tesla Daily Target ETF | 45.39% | -75.98% | -88.79% | -24.75% |
TSLR GraniteShares 2x Long TSLA Daily ETF | -60.77% | -25.97% | 67.57% | -1.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between TSLZ and TSLR is -1.00, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -1.00 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 19, 2023 | -1.00 |
The correlation between TSLZ and TSLR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -1.00 to -1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TSLZ vs. TSLR — Risk / Return Rank
TSLZ
TSLR
TSLZ vs. TSLR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-Rex 2X Inverse Tesla Daily Target ETF (TSLZ) and GraniteShares 2x Long TSLA Daily ETF (TSLR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TSLZ | TSLR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.22 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.52 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.96 | 1.02 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.67 | -0.38 | -0.28 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.82 | -0.86 | +0.03 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TSLZ vs. TSLR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TSLZ drawdown since its inception was -99.11%, which is greater than TSLR's maximum drawdown of -82.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSLZ and TSLR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TSLZ | TSLR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.11% | -82.80% | -16.31% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -69.73% | -69.80% | +0.07% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -98.47% | -79.93% | -18.54% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -76.60% | -51.13% | -25.47% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 56.63% | 31.27% | +25.36% |
Volatility
TSLZ vs. TSLR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for T-Rex 2X Inverse Tesla Daily Target ETF (TSLZ) is 37.13%, while GraniteShares 2x Long TSLA Daily ETF (TSLR) has a volatility of 43.24%. This indicates that TSLZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TSLR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TSLZ | TSLR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 37.13% | 43.24% | -6.11% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 67.39% | 70.76% | -3.37% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 91.79% | 92.93% | -1.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 117.68% | 116.23% | +1.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 117.68% | 116.23% | +1.45% |
TSLZ vs. TSLR - Expense Ratio Comparison
TSLZ has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is higher than TSLR's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
TSLZ vs. TSLR - Dividend Comparison
TSLZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.47%, while TSLR has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
TSLR GraniteShares 2x Long TSLA Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TSLZ T-Rex 2X Inverse Tesla Daily Target ETF | 0.47% | 0.69% | 2.08% | 12.15% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TSLZ and TSLR have a correlation of -1.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TSLR has higher volatility (43.24%) compared to TSLZ (37.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TSLZ dropped -99.11% vs TSLR's -82.80%.
On 1-year performance, TSLR leads with -24.02% vs -48.25% for TSLZ. On fees, TSLR is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, TSLZ has been the lower-risk option at 37.13%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, TSLR has performed better with a -24.02% return vs -48.25%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TSLR is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for TSLZ.
TSLZ has the higher dividend yield at 0.47%, compared with 0.00% for TSLR.
TSLZ is categorized as Inverse Equities, while TSLR is Leveraged Equities. They also come from different issuers: T-Rex and GraniteShares. Their fees differ too: 1.05% for TSLZ and 0.95% for TSLR.
TSLR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.29 vs -0.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TSLZ and TSLR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer