PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TSLT vs. TSLG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TSLT vs. TSLG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T-Rex 2X Long Tesla Daily Target ETF (TSLT) and Leverage Shares 2X Long TSLA Daily ETF (TSLG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with TSLT having a -21.79% return and TSLG slightly higher at -20.82%.


TSLT

1D
-0.05%
1M
13.53%
YTD
-21.79%
6M
-22.60%
1Y
3.78%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

TSLG

1D
-0.14%
1M
13.71%
YTD
-20.82%
6M
-21.35%
1Y
7.28%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TSLT vs. TSLG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
TSLT
T-Rex 2X Long Tesla Daily Target ETF
-21.79%-29.49%-16.98%
TSLG
Leverage Shares 2X Long TSLA Daily ETF
-20.82%-26.70%-16.81%

Correlation

The correlation between TSLT and TSLG is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.00

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 2024

1.00

The correlation between TSLT and TSLG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 1.00 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TSLT vs. TSLG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TSLT
TSLT Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
TSLT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TSLT Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
TSLT Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
TSLT Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
TSLT Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank

TSLG
TSLG Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
TSLG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TSLG Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
TSLG Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
TSLG Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
TSLG Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TSLT vs. TSLG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-Rex 2X Long Tesla Daily Target ETF (TSLT) and Leverage Shares 2X Long TSLA Daily ETF (TSLG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TSLTTSLGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

1.09

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.07

0.13

-0.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.14

0.28

-0.14

TSLT vs. TSLG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TSLT Sharpe Ratio is 0.04, which is lower than the TSLG Sharpe Ratio of 0.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TSLT and TSLG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TSLTTSLGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.04

0.08

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.01

-0.34

+0.35

Drawdowns

TSLT vs. TSLG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TSLT drawdown since its inception was -83.16%, roughly equal to the maximum TSLG drawdown of -82.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSLT and TSLG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TSLTTSLGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-83.16%

-82.86%

-0.30%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-55.08%

-54.61%

-0.47%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-62.01%

-60.00%

-2.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-50.23%

-58.73%

+8.50%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

27.07%

26.63%

+0.44%

Volatility

TSLT vs. TSLG - Volatility Comparison

T-Rex 2X Long Tesla Daily Target ETF (TSLT) and Leverage Shares 2X Long TSLA Daily ETF (TSLG) have volatilities of 24.38% and 24.41%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TSLTTSLGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

24.38%

24.41%

-0.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

54.35%

54.58%

-0.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

92.40%

92.53%

-0.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

117.05%

115.31%

+1.74%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

117.05%

115.31%

+1.74%

TSLT vs. TSLG - Expense Ratio Comparison

TSLT has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is higher than TSLG's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

TSLT vs. TSLG - Dividend Comparison

TSLT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TSLG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.27%.


Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 1.00, TSLT and TSLG move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

TSLG has higher volatility (24.41%) compared to TSLT (24.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TSLT dropped -83.16% vs TSLG's -82.86%.

On 1-year performance, TSLG leads with 7.28% vs 3.78% for TSLT. On fees, TSLG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, TSLG has performed better with a 7.28% return vs 3.78%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TSLG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for TSLT.

TSLG has the higher dividend yield at 8.27%, compared with 0.00% for TSLT.

They also come from different issuers: T-Rex and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.05% for TSLT and 0.75% for TSLG.

TSLG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.08 vs 0.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TSLT and TSLG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer