PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TSLG vs. TQQQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TSLG vs. TQQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 2X Long TSLA Daily ETF (TSLG) and ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TSLG achieves a -28.97% return, which is significantly lower than TQQQ's 56.90% return.


TSLG

1D
2.16%
1M
-11.85%
YTD
-28.97%
6M
-40.18%
1Y
14.94%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

TQQQ

1D
-0.35%
1M
6.09%
YTD
56.90%
6M
52.71%
1Y
129.55%
3Y*
63.58%
5Y*
24.47%
10Y*
47.00%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TSLG vs. TQQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
TSLG
Leverage Shares 2X Long TSLA Daily ETF
-28.97%-26.70%-14.82%
TQQQ
ProShares UltraPro QQQ
56.90%34.35%-9.29%

Correlation

The correlation between TSLG and TQQQ is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.59

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 13, 2024

0.65

The correlation between TSLG and TQQQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.59 to 0.65 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TSLG vs. TQQQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TSLG
TSLG Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
TSLG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TSLG Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
TSLG Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
TSLG Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
TSLG Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank

TQQQ
TQQQ Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
TQQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TQQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
TQQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
TQQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
TQQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TSLG vs. TQQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long TSLA Daily ETF (TSLG) and ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TSLGTQQQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.32

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.84

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

1.36

-0.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.27

3.53

-3.25

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.54

11.25

-10.71

TSLG vs. TQQQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TSLG Sharpe Ratio is 0.17, which is lower than the TQQQ Sharpe Ratio of 2.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TSLG and TQQQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TSLG vs. TQQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TSLG drawdown since its inception was -82.86%, roughly equal to the maximum TQQQ drawdown of -81.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSLG and TQQQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TSLGTQQQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-82.86%

-81.66%

-1.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-54.61%

-36.97%

-17.64%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-58.04%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-81.66%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-81.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-64.12%

-5.32%

-58.80%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-58.75%

-18.50%

-40.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

27.52%

11.56%

+15.96%

Volatility

TSLG vs. TQQQ - Volatility Comparison

Leverage Shares 2X Long TSLA Daily ETF (TSLG) has a higher volatility of 26.61% compared to ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ) at 25.07%. This indicates that TSLG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TQQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TSLGTQQQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

26.61%

25.07%

+1.54%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

56.16%

42.17%

+13.99%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

88.64%

52.51%

+36.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

114.81%

67.26%

+47.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

114.81%

66.36%

+48.45%

TSLG vs. TQQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

TSLG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than TQQQ's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

TSLG vs. TQQQ - Dividend Comparison

TSLG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.22%, more than TQQQ's 0.38% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
TQQQ
ProShares UltraPro QQQ
0.38%0.65%1.27%1.26%0.57%0.00%0.00%0.06%0.11%0.00%0.00%0.01%
TSLG
Leverage Shares 2X Long TSLA Daily ETF
9.22%6.55%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


TSLG and TQQQ have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TSLG has higher volatility (26.61%) compared to TQQQ (25.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TSLG dropped -82.86% vs TQQQ's -81.66%.

On 1-year performance, TQQQ leads with 129.55% vs 14.94% for TSLG. On fees, TSLG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, TQQQ has been the lower-risk option at 25.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, TQQQ has performed better with a 129.55% return vs 14.94%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TSLG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for TQQQ.

TSLG has the higher dividend yield at 9.22%, compared with 0.38% for TQQQ.

They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for TSLG and 0.95% for TQQQ.

TQQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.49 vs 0.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TSLG and TQQQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer