TSLG vs. LITX

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

TSLG (Leverage Shares 2X Long TSLA Daily ETF) and LITX (Tradr 2X Long LITE Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Their 0.31 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. TSLG charges 0.75%/yr vs 1.49%/yr for LITX.

Performance

TSLG vs. LITX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 2X Long TSLA Daily ETF (TSLG) and Tradr 2X Long LITE Daily ETF (LITX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

TSLG

• 1D: 1.40%
• 1M: -40.66%
• 6M: -56.70%
• YTD: -61.16%
• 1Y: -25.02%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -58.09%

LITX

• 1D: 5.60%
• 1M: -12.69%
• 6M: 78.91%
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
LITX Tradr 2X Long LITE Daily ETF	$72.96M	$66.22M	$208.61M
TSLG Leverage Shares 2X Long TSLA Daily ETF	$155.67M	$179.44M	$248.17M

TSLG vs. LITX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
TSLG Leverage Shares 2X Long TSLA Daily ETF	-57.81%
LITX Tradr 2X Long LITE Daily ETF	126.81%

Correlation

The correlation between TSLG and LITX is 0.31, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 27, 2026	0.31

Return for Risk

TSLG vs. LITX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

TSLG

TSLG Risk / Return Rank: 8
TSLG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7
TSLG Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
TSLG Omega Ratio Rank: 11
TSLG Calmar Ratio Rank: 6
TSLG Martin Ratio Rank: 5

LITX

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

TSLG vs. LITX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long TSLA Daily ETF (TSLG) and Tradr 2X Long LITE Daily ETF (LITX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	TSLG	LITX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.30	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.17	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.02	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.40	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.88	—	—

Drawdowns

TSLG vs. LITX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TSLG drawdown since its inception was -82.86%, which is greater than LITX's maximum drawdown of -73.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSLG and LITX.

Drawdown Indicators

	TSLG	LITX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-82.86%	-73.97%	-8.89%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-70.10%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-80.38%	-63.99%	-16.39%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-59.54%	-25.05%	-34.49%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	31.52%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	TSLG	LITX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	43.40%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	70.84%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	92.73%	198.72%	-105.99%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	116.54%	198.72%	-82.18%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	116.54%	198.72%	-82.18%

TSLG vs. LITX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TSLG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than LITX's 1.49% expense ratio.

Dividends

TSLG vs. LITX - Dividend Comparison

TSLG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 16.86%, while LITX has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025
LITX Tradr 2X Long LITE Daily ETF	0.00%	0.00%
TSLG Leverage Shares 2X Long TSLA Daily ETF	16.86%	6.55%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TSLG and LITX in my portfolio?

TSLG and LITX have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, TSLG or LITX?

On fees, TSLG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, TSLG or LITX?

TSLG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.49% for LITX.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TSLG or LITX?

TSLG has the higher dividend yield at 16.86%, compared with 0.00% for LITX.

What is the main difference between TSLG and LITX?

They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and Tradr. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for TSLG and 1.49% for LITX.