PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TSLT vs. LINT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TSLT vs. LINT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T-Rex 2X Long Tesla Daily Target ETF (TSLT) and Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares (LINT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TSLT achieves a -38.04% return, which is significantly lower than LINT's 744.89% return.


TSLT

1D
-11.45%
1M
-22.15%
YTD
-38.04%
6M
-47.16%
1Y
-15.30%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

LINT

1D
-12.86%
1M
11.99%
YTD
744.89%
6M
773.46%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TSLT vs. LINT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
TSLT
T-Rex 2X Long Tesla Daily Target ETF
-38.04%21.02%
LINT
Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares
744.89%5.81%

Correlation

The correlation between TSLT and LINT is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2025

0.34

TSLT vs. LINT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
TSLT
LINT

Consumer Cyclical

100.0%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

100.0%

Utilities

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

TSLT
100.0%
LINT

-

Basic Materials

TSLT

-

LINT

-

Communication Services

TSLT

-

LINT

-

Consumer Defensive

TSLT

-

LINT

-

Energy

TSLT

-

LINT

-

Financial Services

TSLT

-

LINT

-

Healthcare

TSLT

-

LINT

-

Industrials

TSLT

-

LINT

-

Real Estate

TSLT

-

LINT

-

Technology

TSLT

-

LINT
100.0%

Utilities

TSLT

-

LINT

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TSLT vs. LINT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TSLT
TSLT Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
TSLT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TSLT Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
TSLT Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
TSLT Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
TSLT Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank

LINT

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TSLT vs. LINT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-Rex 2X Long Tesla Daily Target ETF (TSLT) and Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares (LINT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TSLTLINTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.28

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.55

TSLT vs. LINT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TSLT vs. LINT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TSLT drawdown since its inception was -83.16%, which is greater than LINT's maximum drawdown of -49.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSLT and LINT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TSLTLINTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-83.16%

-49.54%

-33.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-55.08%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-69.90%

-12.86%

-57.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-50.62%

-20.48%

-30.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

28.13%

Volatility

TSLT vs. LINT - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TSLTLINTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

28.45%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

56.51%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

88.95%

168.83%

-79.88%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

116.87%

168.83%

-51.96%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

116.87%

168.83%

-51.96%

TSLT vs. LINT - Expense Ratio Comparison

TSLT has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is higher than LINT's 0.97% expense ratio.


Dividends

TSLT vs. LINT - Dividend Comparison

TSLT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LINT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.10%.


Frequently Asked Questions


TSLT and LINT have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, LINT is cheaper at 0.97% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

LINT is cheaper with a 0.97% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for TSLT.

LINT has the higher dividend yield at 0.10%, compared with 0.00% for TSLT.

They also come from different issuers: T-Rex and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 1.05% for TSLT and 0.97% for LINT.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TSLT and LINT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer