TSLS vs. TMF
TSLS (Direxion Daily TSLA Bear 1X Shares) and TMF (Direxion Daily 20-Year Treasury Bull 3X) are both exchange-traded funds - TSLS is a Inverse Equities fund tracking the Tesla Inc (--100%), while TMF is a Leveraged Bonds fund tracking the NYSE 20 Year Plus Treasury Bond Index (300%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, TSLS returned -38.35%/yr vs -20.47%/yr for TMF. At a correlation of -0.08, they often move in opposite directions. TSLS charges 1.07%/yr vs 1.09%/yr for TMF.
Performance
TSLS vs. TMF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TSLS achieves a 3.03% return, which is significantly higher than TMF's -5.05% return.
TSLS
- 1D
- -1.93%
- 1M
- -8.56%
- YTD
- 3.03%
- 6M
- -2.42%
- 1Y
- -29.14%
- 3Y*
- -38.35%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TMF
- 1D
- 0.63%
- 1M
- 0.26%
- YTD
- -5.05%
- 6M
- -10.01%
- 1Y
- 1.66%
- 3Y*
- -20.47%
- 5Y*
- -29.85%
- 10Y*
- -16.47%
TSLS vs. TMF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TSLS Direxion Daily TSLA Bear 1X Shares | 3.03% | -34.95% | -55.71% | -60.12% | 100.52% |
TMF Direxion Daily 20-Year Treasury Bull 3X | -5.05% | -2.94% | -35.95% | -13.01% | -42.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between TSLS and TMF is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.01 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.08 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 10, 2022 | -0.08 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TSLS vs. TMF — Risk / Return Rank
TSLS
TMF
TSLS vs. TMF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily TSLA Bear 1X Shares (TSLS) and Direxion Daily 20-Year Treasury Bull 3X (TMF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TSLS | TMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.63 | 0.06 | -0.68 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.72 | 0.29 | -1.01 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.92 | 1.03 | -0.11 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.62 | -0.04 | -0.58 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.87 | -0.08 | -0.79 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TSLS | TMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.63 | 0.06 | -0.68 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | -0.64 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | -0.38 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.54 | -0.13 | -0.40 |
Drawdowns
TSLS vs. TMF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TSLS drawdown since its inception was -90.73%, roughly equal to the maximum TMF drawdown of -92.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSLS and TMF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TSLS | TMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -90.73% | -92.89% | +2.16% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -46.42% | -26.51% | -19.91% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -84.16% | -56.31% | -27.85% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -88.81% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -92.89% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -89.61% | -92.14% | +2.53% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -63.47% | -43.62% | -19.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 32.75% | 11.42% | +21.33% |
Volatility
TSLS vs. TMF - Volatility Comparison
Direxion Daily TSLA Bear 1X Shares (TSLS) has a higher volatility of 12.05% compared to Direxion Daily 20-Year Treasury Bull 3X (TMF) at 8.30%. This indicates that TSLS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TMF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TSLS | TMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.05% | 8.30% | +3.75% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 27.72% | 19.33% | +8.39% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 46.68% | 28.86% | +17.82% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 58.79% | 46.75% | +12.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 58.79% | 43.92% | +14.87% |
TSLS vs. TMF - Expense Ratio Comparison
TSLS has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is lower than TMF's 1.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
TSLS vs. TMF - Dividend Comparison
TSLS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.39%, less than TMF's 4.11% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TMF Direxion Daily 20-Year Treasury Bull 3X | 4.11% | 4.06% | 4.29% | 2.82% | 1.62% | 0.13% | 2.23% | 0.94% | 1.49% | 0.41% |
TSLS Direxion Daily TSLA Bear 1X Shares | 3.39% | 4.30% | 7.62% | 4.52% | 3.46% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TSLS and TMF have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TSLS has higher volatility (12.05%) compared to TMF (8.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TSLS dropped -90.73% vs TMF's -92.89%.
On 3-year performance, TMF leads with -20.47% vs -38.35% for TSLS. On fees, TSLS is cheaper at 1.07% per year. On volatility, TMF has been the lower-risk option at 8.30%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, TMF has performed better with a -20.47% return vs -38.35%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TSLS is cheaper with a 1.07% expense ratio, compared with 1.09% for TMF.
TMF has the higher dividend yield at 4.11%, compared with 3.39% for TSLS.
TSLS is categorized as Inverse Equities, while TMF is Leveraged Bonds. TSLS tracks Tesla Inc (--100%), while TMF tracks NYSE 20 Year Plus Treasury Bond Index (300%). Their fees differ too: 1.07% for TSLS and 1.09% for TMF.
TMF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.06 vs -0.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TSLS and TMF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer