PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TSLS vs. TSLZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TSLS vs. TSLZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily TSLA Bear 1X Shares (TSLS) and T-Rex 2X Inverse Tesla Daily Target ETF (TSLZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TSLS achieves a 3.03% return, which is significantly higher than TSLZ's -5.60% return.


TSLS

1D
-1.93%
1M
-8.56%
YTD
3.03%
6M
-2.42%
1Y
-29.14%
3Y*
-38.35%
5Y*
10Y*

TSLZ

1D
-3.70%
1M
-18.37%
YTD
-5.60%
6M
-16.90%
1Y
-64.61%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TSLS vs. TSLZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
TSLS
Direxion Daily TSLA Bear 1X Shares
3.03%-34.95%-55.71%-12.99%
TSLZ
T-Rex 2X Inverse Tesla Daily Target ETF
-5.60%-75.98%-88.79%-28.07%

Correlation

The correlation between TSLS and TSLZ is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.00

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 20, 2023

1.00

The correlation between TSLS and TSLZ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 1.00 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TSLS vs. TSLZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TSLS
TSLS Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
TSLS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TSLS Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
TSLS Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
TSLS Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
TSLS Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank

TSLZ
TSLZ Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
TSLZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TSLZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
TSLZ Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
TSLZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
TSLZ Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TSLS vs. TSLZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily TSLA Bear 1X Shares (TSLS) and T-Rex 2X Inverse Tesla Daily Target ETF (TSLZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TSLSTSLZDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.63

-0.71

+0.08

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.72

-0.96

+0.24

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.92

0.89

+0.03

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.62

-0.83

+0.22

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.87

-1.06

+0.19

TSLS vs. TSLZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TSLS Sharpe Ratio is -0.63, which is comparable to the TSLZ Sharpe Ratio of -0.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TSLS and TSLZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TSLSTSLZDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.63

-0.71

+0.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.54

-0.67

+0.13

Drawdowns

TSLS vs. TSLZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TSLS drawdown since its inception was -90.73%, smaller than the maximum TSLZ drawdown of -99.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSLS and TSLZ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TSLSTSLZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-90.73%

-99.11%

+8.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-46.42%

-76.62%

+30.20%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-84.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-89.61%

-99.01%

+9.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-63.47%

-75.32%

+11.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

32.75%

60.42%

-27.67%

Volatility

TSLS vs. TSLZ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Direxion Daily TSLA Bear 1X Shares (TSLS) is 12.05%, while T-Rex 2X Inverse Tesla Daily Target ETF (TSLZ) has a volatility of 24.08%. This indicates that TSLS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TSLZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TSLSTSLZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.05%

24.08%

-12.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

27.72%

54.94%

-27.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

46.68%

91.67%

-44.99%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

58.79%

117.13%

-58.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

58.79%

117.13%

-58.34%

TSLS vs. TSLZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

TSLS has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than TSLZ's 1.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

TSLS vs. TSLZ - Dividend Comparison

TSLS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.39%, more than TSLZ's 0.73% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
TSLS
Direxion Daily TSLA Bear 1X Shares
3.39%4.30%7.62%4.52%3.46%
TSLZ
T-Rex 2X Inverse Tesla Daily Target ETF
0.73%0.69%2.08%12.15%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 1.00, TSLS and TSLZ move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

TSLZ has higher volatility (24.08%) compared to TSLS (12.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TSLS dropped -90.73% vs TSLZ's -99.11%.

On 1-year performance, TSLS leads with -29.14% vs -64.61% for TSLZ. On fees, TSLZ is cheaper at 1.05% per year. On volatility, TSLS has been the lower-risk option at 12.05%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, TSLS has performed better with a -29.14% return vs -64.61%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TSLZ is cheaper with a 1.05% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for TSLS.

TSLS has the higher dividend yield at 3.39%, compared with 0.73% for TSLZ.

They also come from different issuers: Direxion and T-Rex. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for TSLS and 1.05% for TSLZ.

TSLS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.63 vs -0.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TSLS and TSLZ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer