PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TSLR vs. ESPO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TSLR vs. ESPO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares 2x Long TSLA Daily ETF (TSLR) and VanEck Vectors Video Gaming and eSports ETF (ESPO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TSLR achieves a -27.58% return, which is significantly lower than ESPO's -15.10% return.


TSLR

1D
3.62%
1M
-19.09%
YTD
-27.58%
6M
-31.37%
1Y
19.41%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

ESPO

1D
-0.29%
1M
-3.31%
YTD
-15.10%
6M
-16.17%
1Y
-14.92%
3Y*
16.96%
5Y*
5.49%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TSLR vs. ESPO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
TSLR
GraniteShares 2x Long TSLA Daily ETF
-27.58%-25.97%67.57%1.69%
ESPO
VanEck Vectors Video Gaming and eSports ETF
-15.10%25.79%47.61%7.87%

Correlation

The correlation between TSLR and ESPO is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.41

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 22, 2023

0.43

TSLR vs. ESPO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
TSLR
ESPO

Consumer Cyclical

66.6%
13.8%

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

78.1%

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

8.2%

Utilities

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

TSLR
66.6%
ESPO
13.8%

Basic Materials

TSLR

-

ESPO

-

Communication Services

TSLR

-

ESPO
78.1%

Consumer Defensive

TSLR

-

ESPO

-

Energy

TSLR

-

ESPO

-

Financial Services

TSLR

-

ESPO

-

Healthcare

TSLR

-

ESPO

-

Industrials

TSLR

-

ESPO

-

Real Estate

TSLR

-

ESPO

-

Technology

TSLR

-

ESPO
8.2%

Utilities

TSLR

-

ESPO

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TSLR vs. ESPO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TSLR
TSLR Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
TSLR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TSLR Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
TSLR Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
TSLR Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
TSLR Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank

ESPO
ESPO Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
ESPO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ESPO Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
ESPO Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
ESPO Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
ESPO Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TSLR vs. ESPO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Long TSLA Daily ETF (TSLR) and VanEck Vectors Video Gaming and eSports ETF (ESPO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TSLRESPODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.97

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

0.88

+0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.36

-0.54

+0.90

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.73

-0.94

+1.67

TSLR vs. ESPO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TSLR Sharpe Ratio is 0.22, which is higher than the ESPO Sharpe Ratio of -0.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TSLR and ESPO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TSLR vs. ESPO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TSLR drawdown since its inception was -82.80%, which is greater than ESPO's maximum drawdown of -50.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSLR and ESPO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TSLRESPODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-82.80%

-50.99%

-31.81%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-54.37%

-27.81%

-26.56%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.81%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-48.33%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-62.94%

-27.19%

-35.75%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-50.31%

-15.06%

-35.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

26.72%

15.95%

+10.77%

Volatility

TSLR vs. ESPO - Volatility Comparison

GraniteShares 2x Long TSLA Daily ETF (TSLR) has a higher volatility of 28.92% compared to VanEck Vectors Video Gaming and eSports ETF (ESPO) at 4.42%. This indicates that TSLR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ESPO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TSLRESPODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

28.92%

4.42%

+24.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

57.66%

14.67%

+42.99%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

89.10%

18.83%

+70.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

115.61%

25.10%

+90.51%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

115.61%

25.71%

+89.90%

TSLR vs. ESPO - Expense Ratio Comparison

TSLR has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than ESPO's 0.55% expense ratio.


Dividends

TSLR vs. ESPO - Dividend Comparison

TSLR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ESPO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.47%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
ESPO
VanEck Vectors Video Gaming and eSports ETF
1.47%1.24%0.44%0.96%0.91%3.36%0.12%0.22%0.04%
TSLR
GraniteShares 2x Long TSLA Daily ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


TSLR and ESPO have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TSLR has higher volatility (28.92%) compared to ESPO (4.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TSLR dropped -82.80% vs ESPO's -50.99%.

On 1-year performance, TSLR leads with 19.41% vs -14.92% for ESPO. On fees, ESPO is cheaper at 0.55% per year. On volatility, ESPO has been the lower-risk option at 4.42%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, TSLR has performed better with a 19.41% return vs -14.92%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ESPO is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for TSLR.

ESPO has the higher dividend yield at 1.47%, compared with 0.00% for TSLR.

TSLR is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while ESPO is Large Cap Growth Equities. They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 1.50% for TSLR and 0.55% for ESPO.

TSLR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.22 vs -0.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TSLR and ESPO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer