TSLR vs. TSLL
TSLR (GraniteShares 2x Long TSLA Daily ETF) and TSLL (Direxion Daily TSLA Bull 2X ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, TSLR returned 16.68% vs 14.93% for TSLL. With a 1.00 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. TSLR charges 1.50%/yr vs 0.83%/yr for TSLL.
Performance
TSLR vs. TSLL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with TSLR having a -28.33% return and TSLL slightly lower at -28.97%.
TSLR
- 1D
- 2.32%
- 1M
- -11.83%
- YTD
- -28.33%
- 6M
- -39.59%
- 1Y
- 16.68%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TSLL
- 1D
- 2.36%
- 1M
- -11.73%
- YTD
- -28.97%
- 6M
- -40.25%
- 1Y
- 14.93%
- 3Y*
- -2.99%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TSLR vs. TSLL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
TSLR GraniteShares 2x Long TSLA Daily ETF | -28.33% | -25.97% | 67.57% | 1.69% |
TSLL Direxion Daily TSLA Bull 2X ETF | -28.97% | -26.80% | 99.63% | 5.43% |
Correlation
The correlation between TSLR and TSLL is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.00 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 22, 2023 | 1.00 |
The correlation between TSLR and TSLL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 1.00 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.
TSLR vs. TSLL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
TSLR
TSLL
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
TSLR
TSLL
Basic Materials
TSLR
-
TSLL
-
Communication Services
TSLR
-
TSLL
-
Consumer Defensive
TSLR
-
TSLL
-
Energy
TSLR
-
TSLL
-
Financial Services
TSLR
-
TSLL
-
Healthcare
TSLR
-
TSLL
-
Industrials
TSLR
-
TSLL
-
Real Estate
TSLR
-
TSLL
-
Technology
TSLR
-
TSLL
-
Utilities
TSLR
-
TSLL
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TSLR vs. TSLL — Risk / Return Rank
TSLR
TSLL
TSLR vs. TSLL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Long TSLA Daily ETF (TSLR) and Direxion Daily TSLA Bull 2X ETF (TSLL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TSLR | TSLL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.02 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.03 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | 1.10 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.31 | 0.27 | +0.03 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.61 | 0.54 | +0.07 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TSLR vs. TSLL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TSLR drawdown since its inception was -82.80%, roughly equal to the maximum TSLL drawdown of -82.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSLR and TSLL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TSLR | TSLL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -82.80% | -82.88% | +0.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -54.37% | -54.75% | +0.38% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -82.88% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -63.32% | -64.13% | +0.81% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -50.40% | -53.90% | +3.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 27.31% | 27.62% | -0.31% |
Volatility
TSLR vs. TSLL - Volatility Comparison
GraniteShares 2x Long TSLA Daily ETF (TSLR) and Direxion Daily TSLA Bull 2X ETF (TSLL) have volatilities of 26.53% and 26.10%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TSLR | TSLL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 26.53% | 26.10% | +0.43% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 56.18% | 55.85% | +0.33% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 88.87% | 88.37% | +0.50% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 115.27% | 106.78% | +8.49% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 115.27% | 106.78% | +8.49% |
TSLR vs. TSLL - Expense Ratio Comparison
TSLR has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than TSLL's 0.83% expense ratio.
Dividends
TSLR vs. TSLL - Dividend Comparison
TSLR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TSLL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.20%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TSLL Direxion Daily TSLA Bull 2X ETF | 7.20% | 5.00% | 2.47% | 4.44% | 1.57% |
TSLR GraniteShares 2x Long TSLA Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 1.00, TSLR and TSLL move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
TSLR has higher volatility (26.53%) compared to TSLL (26.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TSLR dropped -82.80% vs TSLL's -82.88%.
On 1-year performance, TSLR leads with 16.68% vs 14.93% for TSLL. On fees, TSLL is cheaper at 0.83% per year. On volatility, TSLL has been the lower-risk option at 26.10%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, TSLR has performed better with a 16.68% return vs 14.93%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TSLL is cheaper with a 0.83% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for TSLR.
TSLL has the higher dividend yield at 7.20%, compared with 0.00% for TSLR.
They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 1.50% for TSLR and 0.83% for TSLL.
TSLR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.19 vs 0.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TSLR and TSLL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer