TSLR vs. TSLA
TSLR (GraniteShares 2x Long TSLA Daily ETF) is Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by GraniteShares, while TSLA (Tesla, Inc.) is a stock. Over the past year, TSLR returned 8.94% vs 23.07% for TSLA. With a 1.00 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep.
Performance
TSLR vs. TSLA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TSLR achieves a -20.05% return, which is significantly lower than TSLA's -5.79% return.
TSLR
- 1D
- -0.17%
- 1M
- 13.88%
- YTD
- -20.05%
- 6M
- -20.52%
- 1Y
- 8.94%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TSLA
- 1D
- -0.01%
- 1M
- 7.95%
- YTD
- -5.79%
- 6M
- -5.16%
- 1Y
- 23.07%
- 3Y*
- 25.57%
- 5Y*
- 16.24%
- 10Y*
- 40.05%
TSLR vs. TSLA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
TSLR GraniteShares 2x Long TSLA Daily ETF | -20.05% | -25.97% | 67.57% | 1.69% |
TSLA Tesla, Inc. | -5.79% | 11.36% | 62.52% | 6.56% |
Correlation
The correlation between TSLR and TSLA is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.00 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 23, 2023 | 1.00 |
The correlation between TSLR and TSLA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 1.00 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TSLR vs. TSLA — Risk / Return Rank
TSLR
TSLA
TSLR vs. TSLA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Long TSLA Daily ETF (TSLR) and Tesla, Inc. (TSLA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TSLR | TSLA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.40 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.17 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | 1.12 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.17 | 0.77 | -0.61 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.34 | 1.81 | -1.47 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TSLR | TSLA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.10 | 0.50 | -0.40 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.28 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.68 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.00 | 0.73 | -0.73 |
Drawdowns
TSLR vs. TSLA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TSLR drawdown since its inception was -82.80%, which is greater than TSLA's maximum drawdown of -73.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSLR and TSLA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TSLR | TSLA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -82.80% | -73.63% | -9.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -54.37% | -29.93% | -24.44% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -53.77% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -73.63% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -73.63% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -59.09% | -13.51% | -45.58% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -50.24% | -22.73% | -27.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 26.45% | 12.84% | +13.61% |
Volatility
TSLR vs. TSLA - Volatility Comparison
GraniteShares 2x Long TSLA Daily ETF (TSLR) has a higher volatility of 24.40% compared to Tesla, Inc. (TSLA) at 12.12%. This indicates that TSLR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TSLA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TSLR | TSLA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 24.40% | 12.12% | +12.28% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 54.65% | 27.28% | +27.37% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 92.75% | 46.36% | +46.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 115.54% | 58.85% | +56.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 115.54% | 59.11% | +56.43% |
Dividends
TSLR vs. TSLA - Dividend Comparison
Neither TSLR nor TSLA has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 1.00, TSLR and TSLA move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
TSLR has higher volatility (24.40%) compared to TSLA (12.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TSLR dropped -82.80% vs TSLA's -73.63%.
TSLA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.50 vs 0.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TSLR and TSLA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer