TSLP vs. AAPY
TSLP (Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Tesla ETF) and AAPY (Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Apple (AAPL) ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TSLP is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Kurv, while AAPY is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Kurv. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, TSLP returned 15.63% vs 43.66% for AAPY. At a 0.36 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.99% expense ratio.
Performance
TSLP vs. AAPY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TSLP achieves a -8.72% return, which is significantly lower than AAPY's 14.66% return.
TSLP
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- 7.73%
- YTD
- -8.72%
- 6M
- -8.30%
- 1Y
- 15.63%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AAPY
- 1D
- -1.55%
- 1M
- 13.81%
- YTD
- 14.66%
- 6M
- 11.04%
- 1Y
- 43.66%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TSLP vs. AAPY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
TSLP Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Tesla ETF | -8.72% | 9.77% | 41.53% | 18.42% |
AAPY Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Apple (AAPL) ETF | 14.66% | 5.04% | 20.54% | 9.23% |
Correlation
The correlation between TSLP and AAPY is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 30, 2023 | 0.36 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TSLP vs. AAPY — Risk / Return Rank
TSLP
AAPY
TSLP vs. AAPY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Tesla ETF (TSLP) and Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Apple (AAPL) ETF (AAPY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TSLP | AAPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.68 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.04 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | 1.38 | -0.28 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.49 | 3.03 | -2.54 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.20 | 8.23 | -7.04 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TSLP | AAPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.37 | 2.05 | -1.68 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.46 | 0.87 | -0.41 |
Drawdowns
TSLP vs. AAPY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TSLP drawdown since its inception was -46.00%, which is greater than AAPY's maximum drawdown of -29.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSLP and AAPY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TSLP | AAPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -46.00% | -29.22% | -16.78% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -32.00% | -14.47% | -17.53% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -15.68% | -1.55% | -14.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.73% | -6.34% | -9.39% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.16% | 5.32% | +7.84% |
Volatility
TSLP vs. AAPY - Volatility Comparison
Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Tesla ETF (TSLP) has a higher volatility of 12.75% compared to Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Apple (AAPL) ETF (AAPY) at 6.18%. This indicates that TSLP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AAPY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TSLP | AAPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.75% | 6.18% | +6.57% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 28.48% | 17.77% | +10.71% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 42.87% | 21.42% | +21.45% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 48.60% | 22.58% | +26.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 48.60% | 22.58% | +26.02% |
TSLP vs. AAPY - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both TSLP and AAPY have an expense ratio of 0.99%.
Dividends
TSLP vs. AAPY - Dividend Comparison
TSLP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 30.32%, more than AAPY's 11.30% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
AAPY Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Apple (AAPL) ETF | 11.30% | 12.66% | 17.15% | 2.16% |
TSLP Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Tesla ETF | 30.32% | 31.05% | 21.82% | 4.39% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TSLP and AAPY have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TSLP has higher volatility (12.75%) compared to AAPY (6.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TSLP dropped -46.00% vs AAPY's -29.22%.
On 1-year performance, AAPY leads with 43.66% vs 15.63% for TSLP. Both ETFs have the same 0.99% expense ratio. On volatility, AAPY has been the lower-risk option at 6.18%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, AAPY has performed better with a 43.66% return vs 15.63%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TSLP and AAPY have the same expense ratio: 0.99% per year.
TSLP has the higher dividend yield at 30.32%, compared with 11.30% for AAPY.
TSLP is categorized as Derivative Income, while AAPY is Large Cap Blend Equities.
AAPY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.05 vs 0.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TSLP and AAPY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer