TSLA vs. CLS
TSLA (Tesla, Inc.) and CLS (Celestica Inc.) are both stocks. TSLA operates in Auto Manufacturers (Consumer Cyclical), while CLS operates in Electronic Components (Technology). Over the past 10 years, TSLA returned 39.72%/yr vs 43.71%/yr for CLS. At a 0.28 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
TSLA vs. CLS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TSLA achieves a -9.63% return, which is significantly lower than CLS's 32.99% return. Over the past 10 years, TSLA has underperformed CLS with an annualized return of 39.72%, while CLS has yielded a comparatively higher 43.71% annualized return.
TSLA
- 1D
- 1.82%
- 1M
- -8.72%
- YTD
- -9.63%
- 6M
- -11.45%
- 1Y
- 27.36%
- 3Y*
- 16.25%
- 5Y*
- 14.86%
- 10Y*
- 39.72%
CLS
- 1D
- 1.88%
- 1M
- 5.52%
- YTD
- 32.99%
- 6M
- 28.26%
- 1Y
- 200.71%
- 3Y*
- 207.28%
- 5Y*
- 116.26%
- 10Y*
- 43.71%
TSLA vs. CLS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TSLA Tesla, Inc. | -9.63% | 11.36% | 62.52% | 101.72% | -65.03% | 49.76% | 743.44% | 25.70% | 6.89% | 45.70% |
CLS Celestica Inc. | 32.99% | 220.27% | 215.23% | 159.80% | 1.26% | 37.92% | -2.42% | -5.70% | -16.32% | -11.56% |
Correlation
The correlation between TSLA and CLS is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 29, 2010 | 0.28 |
Fundamentals
TSLA:
$1.44T
CLS:
$45.48B
TSLA:
$1.10
CLS:
$8.28
TSLA:
370.20
CLS:
47.45
TSLA:
45.29
CLS:
0.64
TSLA:
14.66
CLS:
3.30
TSLA:
17.10
CLS:
21.68
TSLA:
$97.88B
CLS:
$13.81B
TSLA:
$18.66B
CLS:
$1.60B
TSLA:
$10.48B
CLS:
$1.32B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TSLA vs. CLS — Risk / Return Rank
TSLA
CLS
TSLA vs. CLS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tesla, Inc. (TSLA) and Celestica Inc. (CLS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TSLA | CLS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.16 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.68 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 1.37 | -0.24 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.92 | 6.91 | -5.99 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.10 | 16.83 | -14.73 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TSLA vs. CLS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TSLA drawdown since its inception was -73.63%, smaller than the maximum CLS drawdown of -96.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSLA and CLS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TSLA | CLS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -73.63% | -96.93% | +23.30% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -29.93% | -29.24% | -0.69% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -53.77% | -53.96% | +0.19% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -73.63% | -53.96% | -19.67% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -73.63% | -80.60% | +6.97% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -17.03% | -16.78% | -0.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -22.72% | -73.31% | +50.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.06% | 11.98% | +1.08% |
Volatility
TSLA vs. CLS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Tesla, Inc. (TSLA) is 14.25%, while Celestica Inc. (CLS) has a volatility of 27.54%. This indicates that TSLA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CLS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TSLA | CLS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.25% | 27.54% | -13.29% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 28.73% | 55.42% | -26.69% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 44.49% | 72.65% | -28.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 58.98% | 57.70% | +1.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 59.14% | 49.97% | +9.17% |
Dividends
TSLA vs. CLS - Dividend Comparison
Neither TSLA nor CLS has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
TSLA vs. CLS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Tesla, Inc. and Celestica Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
TSLA vs. CLS - Profitability Comparison
TSLA - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Tesla, Inc. reported a gross profit of 4.72B and revenue of 22.39B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 21.1%.
CLS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Celestica Inc. reported a gross profit of 437.20M and revenue of 4.05B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 10.8%.
TSLA - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Tesla, Inc. reported an operating income of 941.00M and revenue of 22.39B, resulting in an operating margin of 4.2%.
CLS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Celestica Inc. reported an operating income of 272.10M and revenue of 4.05B, resulting in an operating margin of 6.7%.
TSLA - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Tesla, Inc. reported a net income of 491.00M and revenue of 22.39B, resulting in a net margin of 2.2%.
CLS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Celestica Inc. reported a net income of 212.30M and revenue of 4.05B, resulting in a net margin of 5.3%.
Frequently Asked Questions
TSLA and CLS have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CLS has higher volatility (27.54%) compared to TSLA (14.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TSLA dropped -73.63% vs CLS's -96.93%.
CLS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.78 vs 0.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TSLA and CLS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer