TSL vs. XOMO
TSL (GraniteShares 1.25x Long Tsla Daily ETF) and XOMO (YieldMax XOM Option Income Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TSL is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by GraniteShares, while XOMO is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by YieldMax. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, TSL returned 0.94% vs 29.81% for XOMO. Their -0.01 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. TSL charges 1.15%/yr vs 1.01%/yr for XOMO.
Performance
TSL vs. XOMO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TSL achieves a -36.68% return, which is significantly lower than XOMO's 20.15% return.
TSL
- 1D
- 4.19%
- 1M
- -22.91%
- 6M
- -31.12%
- YTD
- -36.68%
- 1Y
- 0.94%
- 3Y*
- 0.02%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -7.13%
XOMO
- 1D
- -0.09%
- 1M
- 10.85%
- 6M
- 7.87%
- YTD
- 20.15%
- 1Y
- 29.81%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 7.81%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $7.63M | $7.71M | $12.52M | |
| $559.24K | $694.66K | $715.05K |
TSL vs. XOMO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
TSL GraniteShares 1.25x Long Tsla Daily ETF | -36.68% | 3.49% | 64.12% | -7.69% |
XOMO YieldMax XOM Option Income Strategy ETF | 20.15% | 6.90% | 6.11% | -8.59% |
Correlation
The correlation between TSL and XOMO is -0.20, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.20 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 31, 2023 | -0.01 |
The correlation between TSL and XOMO shifts across timeframes, from -0.20 (1 year) to -0.01 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TSL vs. XOMO — Risk / Return Rank
TSL
XOMO
TSL vs. XOMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 1.25x Long Tsla Daily ETF (TSL) and YieldMax XOM Option Income Strategy ETF (XOMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TSL | XOMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.44 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.53 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.05 | 1.26 | -0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.02 | 1.74 | -1.72 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.05 | 4.35 | -4.30 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TSL vs. XOMO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TSL drawdown since its inception was -74.52%, which is greater than XOMO's maximum drawdown of -18.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSL and XOMO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TSL | XOMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -74.52% | -18.90% | -55.62% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -48.38% | -17.25% | -31.13% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -63.30% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -47.52% | -7.65% | -39.87% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -38.51% | -7.50% | -31.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 19.82% | 6.89% | +12.93% |
Volatility
TSL vs. XOMO - Volatility Comparison
GraniteShares 1.25x Long Tsla Daily ETF (TSL) has a higher volatility of 25.38% compared to YieldMax XOM Option Income Strategy ETF (XOMO) at 6.21%. This indicates that TSL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XOMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TSL | XOMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 25.38% | 6.21% | +19.17% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 43.47% | 17.24% | +26.23% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 57.91% | 20.67% | +37.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 73.44% | 19.19% | +54.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 73.44% | 19.19% | +54.25% |
TSL vs. XOMO - Expense Ratio Comparison
TSL has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is higher than XOMO's 1.01% expense ratio.
Dividends
TSL vs. XOMO - Dividend Comparison
TSL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XOMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 37.07%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
TSL GraniteShares 1.25x Long Tsla Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 60.47% |
XOMO YieldMax XOM Option Income Strategy ETF | 37.07% | 31.64% | 26.94% | 5.13% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TSL and XOMO have a correlation of -0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TSL has higher volatility (25.38%) compared to XOMO (6.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TSL dropped -74.52% vs XOMO's -18.90%.
On 1-year performance, XOMO leads with 29.81% vs 0.94% for TSL. On fees, XOMO is cheaper at 1.01% per year. On volatility, XOMO has been the lower-risk option at 6.21%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, XOMO has performed better with a 29.81% return vs 0.94%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XOMO is cheaper with a 1.01% expense ratio, compared with 1.15% for TSL.
XOMO has the higher dividend yield at 37.07%, compared with 0.00% for TSL.
TSL is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while XOMO is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and YieldMax. Their fees differ too: 1.15% for TSL and 1.01% for XOMO.
XOMO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.45 vs 0.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TSL and XOMO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer