TSL vs. QQQ
TSL (GraniteShares 1.25x Long Tsla Daily ETF) and QQQ (Invesco QQQ ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TSL is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by GraniteShares, while QQQ is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. TSL is actively managed, while QQQ is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, TSL returned 20.28%/yr vs 28.78%/yr for QQQ. A 0.59 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TSL charges 1.15%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for QQQ.
Performance
TSL vs. QQQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TSL achieves a -9.40% return, which is significantly lower than QQQ's 21.30% return.
TSL
- 1D
- -0.11%
- 1M
- 9.37%
- YTD
- -9.40%
- 6M
- -9.11%
- 1Y
- 20.41%
- 3Y*
- 20.28%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QQQ
- 1D
- -0.26%
- 1M
- 10.60%
- YTD
- 21.30%
- 6M
- 19.66%
- 1Y
- 41.82%
- 3Y*
- 28.78%
- 5Y*
- 17.97%
- 10Y*
- 21.94%
TSL vs. QQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TSL GraniteShares 1.25x Long Tsla Daily ETF | -9.40% | 3.49% | 64.12% | 113.79% | -66.58% |
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF | 21.30% | 20.77% | 25.58% | 54.86% | -15.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between TSL and QQQ is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 10, 2022 | 0.59 |
The correlation between TSL and QQQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.56 to 0.59 - a consistent structural relationship.
TSL vs. QQQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
TSL
QQQ
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Consumer Cyclical
TSL
QQQ
Basic Materials
TSL
-
QQQ
Communication Services
TSL
-
QQQ
Consumer Defensive
TSL
-
QQQ
Energy
TSL
-
QQQ
Financial Services
TSL
-
QQQ
Healthcare
TSL
-
QQQ
Industrials
TSL
-
QQQ
Real Estate
TSL
-
QQQ
Technology
TSL
-
QQQ
Utilities
TSL
-
QQQ
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TSL vs. QQQ — Risk / Return Rank
TSL
QQQ
TSL vs. QQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 1.25x Long Tsla Daily ETF (TSL) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TSL | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.28 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.58 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 1.45 | -0.35 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.55 | 3.51 | -2.96 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.26 | 13.49 | -12.24 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TSL | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.35 | 2.64 | -2.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.81 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.99 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.03 | 0.41 | -0.38 |
Drawdowns
TSL vs. QQQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TSL drawdown since its inception was -74.52%, smaller than the maximum QQQ drawdown of -82.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSL and QQQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TSL | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -74.52% | -82.97% | +8.45% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -36.98% | -11.96% | -25.02% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -63.30% | -22.77% | -40.53% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -35.12% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.12% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -24.91% | -0.26% | -24.65% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -38.71% | -32.79% | -5.92% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.38% | 3.11% | +13.27% |
Volatility
TSL vs. QQQ - Volatility Comparison
GraniteShares 1.25x Long Tsla Daily ETF (TSL) has a higher volatility of 15.25% compared to Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) at 4.49%. This indicates that TSL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TSL | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.25% | 4.49% | +10.76% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 34.12% | 12.10% | +22.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 57.94% | 15.94% | +42.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 73.18% | 22.38% | +50.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 73.18% | 22.29% | +50.89% |
TSL vs. QQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
TSL has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQ's 0.18% expense ratio.
Dividends
TSL vs. QQQ - Dividend Comparison
TSL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.38%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF | 0.38% | 0.45% | 0.56% | 0.62% | 0.80% | 0.43% | 0.55% | 0.74% | 0.91% | 0.84% | 1.06% | 0.99% |
TSL GraniteShares 1.25x Long Tsla Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 60.47% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TSL and QQQ have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TSL has higher volatility (15.25%) compared to QQQ (4.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TSL dropped -74.52% vs QQQ's -82.97%.
On 3-year performance, QQQ leads with 28.78% vs 20.28% for TSL. On fees, QQQ is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, QQQ has been the lower-risk option at 4.49%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, QQQ has performed better with a 28.78% return vs 20.28%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QQQ is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 1.15% for TSL.
QQQ has the higher dividend yield at 0.38%, compared with 0.00% for TSL.
TSL is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while QQQ is Nasdaq-100. They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 1.15% for TSL and 0.18% for QQQ.
QQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.64 vs 0.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TSL and QQQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer