PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TSEP vs. CIBR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TSEP vs. CIBR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - September (TSEP) and First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TSEP achieves a 9.07% return, which is significantly lower than CIBR's 28.52% return.


TSEP

1D
-0.16%
1M
1.50%
YTD
9.07%
6M
10.71%
1Y
23.98%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

CIBR

1D
-2.81%
1M
31.43%
YTD
28.52%
6M
24.03%
1Y
25.78%
3Y*
28.32%
5Y*
16.28%
10Y*
18.49%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TSEP vs. CIBR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
TSEP
FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - September
9.07%20.91%-1.87%
CIBR
First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF
28.52%13.06%6.70%

Correlation

The correlation between TSEP and CIBR is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.38

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2024

0.42

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TSEP vs. CIBR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TSEP
TSEP Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
TSEP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TSEP Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
TSEP Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
TSEP Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
TSEP Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

CIBR
CIBR Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
CIBR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CIBR Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
CIBR Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
CIBR Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
CIBR Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TSEP vs. CIBR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - September (TSEP) and First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TSEPCIBRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.31

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.75

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

1.20

+0.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.32

1.18

+2.15

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.65

2.79

+10.85

TSEP vs. CIBR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TSEP Sharpe Ratio is 2.37, which is higher than the CIBR Sharpe Ratio of 1.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TSEP and CIBR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TSEPCIBRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.37

1.06

+1.31

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.79

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.46

0.67

+0.79

Drawdowns

TSEP vs. CIBR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TSEP drawdown since its inception was -9.83%, smaller than the maximum CIBR drawdown of -33.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSEP and CIBR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TSEPCIBRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-9.83%

-33.89%

+24.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.25%

-21.99%

+14.74%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.99%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.89%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.16%

-2.81%

+2.65%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.69%

-8.66%

+6.97%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.76%

9.25%

-7.49%

Volatility

TSEP vs. CIBR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - September (TSEP) is 2.09%, while First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR) has a volatility of 10.90%. This indicates that TSEP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CIBR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TSEPCIBRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.09%

10.90%

-8.81%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.98%

20.90%

-12.92%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.17%

24.50%

-14.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.37%

24.95%

-13.58%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.37%

23.60%

-12.23%

TSEP vs. CIBR - Expense Ratio Comparison

TSEP has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than CIBR's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

TSEP vs. CIBR - Dividend Comparison

TSEP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CIBR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.45%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CIBR
First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF
0.45%0.42%0.29%0.42%0.31%0.59%1.10%0.23%0.23%0.10%0.77%0.58%
TSEP
FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - September
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


TSEP and CIBR have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CIBR has higher volatility (10.90%) compared to TSEP (2.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TSEP dropped -9.83% vs CIBR's -33.89%.

On 1-year performance, CIBR leads with 25.78% vs 23.98% for TSEP. On fees, CIBR is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, TSEP has been the lower-risk option at 2.09%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, CIBR has performed better with a 25.78% return vs 23.98%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

CIBR is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for TSEP.

CIBR has the higher dividend yield at 0.45%, compared with 0.00% for TSEP.

TSEP is categorized as Defined Outcome, while CIBR is Technology Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for TSEP and 0.60% for CIBR.

TSEP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.37 vs 1.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TSEP and CIBR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer