TSCV vs. IWN

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

TSCV (Thrivent Small Cap Value ETF) and IWN (iShares Russell 2000 Value ETF) are both Small Cap Value Equities funds. TSCV is actively managed, while IWN is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. TSCV charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.24%/yr for IWN.

Performance

TSCV vs. IWN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Thrivent Small Cap Value ETF (TSCV) and iShares Russell 2000 Value ETF (IWN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TSCV achieves a 15.89% return, which is significantly lower than IWN's 17.42% return.

TSCV

• 1D: -0.29%
• 1M: 1.16%
• YTD: 15.89%
• 6M: 14.99%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

IWN

• 1D: -1.31%
• 1M: 2.73%
• YTD: 17.42%
• 6M: 16.54%
• 1Y: 41.15%
• 3Y*: 17.66%
• 5Y*: 6.48%
• 10Y*: 10.16%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TSCV vs. IWN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
TSCV Thrivent Small Cap Value ETF	15.89%	6.24%
IWN iShares Russell 2000 Value ETF	17.42%	6.64%

Correlation

The correlation between TSCV and IWN is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2025	0.89

Return for Risk

TSCV vs. IWN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IWN

IWN Risk / Return Rank: 74
IWN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 69
IWN Sortino Ratio Rank: 71
IWN Omega Ratio Rank: 64
IWN Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
IWN Martin Ratio Rank: 81

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TSCV vs. IWN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Thrivent Small Cap Value ETF (TSCV) and iShares Russell 2000 Value ETF (IWN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TSCV	IWN	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	2.33	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.30	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.44	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	2.84	0.39	+2.45

Drawdowns

TSCV vs. IWN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TSCV drawdown since its inception was -10.17%, smaller than the maximum IWN drawdown of -61.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSCV and IWN.

Drawdown Indicators

	TSCV	IWN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-10.17%	-61.55%	+51.38%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-8.45%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-26.70%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-26.70%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-46.08%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.70%	-1.47%	+0.77%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.11%	-10.16%	+8.05%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	2.51%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	TSCV	IWN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	4.91%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	11.86%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.80%	17.81%	-1.01%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.80%	21.43%	-4.63%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.80%	23.39%	-6.59%

TSCV vs. IWN - Expense Ratio Comparison

TSCV has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than IWN's 0.24% expense ratio.

Dividends

TSCV vs. IWN - Dividend Comparison

TSCV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.24%, less than IWN's 1.46% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
IWN iShares Russell 2000 Value ETF	1.46%	1.70%	1.80%	2.04%	2.12%	1.48%	1.60%	1.92%	1.99%	1.78%	1.74%	2.15%
TSCV Thrivent Small Cap Value ETF	0.24%	0.28%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TSCV and IWN in my portfolio?

TSCV and IWN have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, TSCV or IWN?

On fees, IWN is cheaper at 0.24% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, TSCV or IWN?

IWN is cheaper with a 0.24% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for TSCV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TSCV or IWN?

IWN has the higher dividend yield at 1.46%, compared with 0.24% for TSCV.

What is the main difference between TSCV and IWN?

They also come from different issuers: Thrivent and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for TSCV and 0.24% for IWN.