TSCV vs. IWN
TSCV (Thrivent Small Cap Value ETF) and IWN (iShares Russell 2000 Value ETF) are both Small Cap Value Equities funds. TSCV is actively managed, while IWN is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. TSCV charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.24%/yr for IWN.
Performance
TSCV vs. IWN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with TSCV having a 20.01% return and IWN slightly higher at 20.82%.
TSCV
- 1D
- -0.82%
- 1M
- 4.42%
- YTD
- 20.01%
- 6M
- 18.17%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IWN
- 1D
- -0.20%
- 1M
- 3.32%
- YTD
- 20.82%
- 6M
- 18.59%
- 1Y
- 42.32%
- 3Y*
- 19.19%
- 5Y*
- 7.16%
- 10Y*
- 10.72%
TSCV vs. IWN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
TSCV Thrivent Small Cap Value ETF | 20.01% | 6.24% |
IWN iShares Russell 2000 Value ETF | 20.82% | 4.34% |
Correlation
The correlation between TSCV and IWN is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2025 | 0.89 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TSCV vs. IWN — Risk / Return Rank
TSCV
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
IWN
TSCV vs. IWN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Thrivent Small Cap Value ETF (TSCV) and iShares Russell 2000 Value ETF (IWN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TSCV | IWN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.40 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 5.03 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 16.92 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TSCV vs. IWN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TSCV drawdown since its inception was -10.17%, smaller than the maximum IWN drawdown of -61.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSCV and IWN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TSCV | IWN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -10.17% | -61.55% | +51.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -8.45% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -26.70% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -26.70% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -46.08% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.82% | -0.20% | -0.62% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.95% | -10.14% | +8.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.51% | — |
Volatility
TSCV vs. IWN - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TSCV | IWN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 5.29% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 12.29% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.72% | 18.04% | -1.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.72% | 21.41% | -4.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.72% | 23.39% | -6.67% |
TSCV vs. IWN - Expense Ratio Comparison
TSCV has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than IWN's 0.24% expense ratio.
Dividends
TSCV vs. IWN - Dividend Comparison
TSCV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.24%, less than IWN's 1.46% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IWN iShares Russell 2000 Value ETF | 1.46% | 1.70% | 1.80% | 2.04% | 2.12% | 1.48% | 1.60% | 1.92% | 1.99% | 1.78% | 1.74% | 2.15% |
TSCV Thrivent Small Cap Value ETF | 0.24% | 0.28% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TSCV and IWN have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IWN is cheaper at 0.24% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IWN is cheaper with a 0.24% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for TSCV.
IWN has the higher dividend yield at 1.46%, compared with 0.24% for TSCV.
They also come from different issuers: Thrivent and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for TSCV and 0.24% for IWN.
Find the right allocation for TSCV and IWN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer