TSCV vs. FNK
TSCV (Thrivent Small Cap Value ETF) and FNK (First Trust Mid Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund) are both Small Cap Value Equities funds. TSCV is actively managed, while FNK is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. TSCV charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.70%/yr for FNK.
Performance
TSCV vs. FNK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TSCV achieves a 16.79% return, which is significantly higher than FNK's 8.15% return.
TSCV
- 1D
- 0.77%
- 1M
- 0.80%
- YTD
- 16.79%
- 6M
- 16.01%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FNK
- 1D
- 0.87%
- 1M
- 0.45%
- YTD
- 8.15%
- 6M
- 8.73%
- 1Y
- 21.38%
- 3Y*
- 13.89%
- 5Y*
- 7.16%
- 10Y*
- 9.25%
TSCV vs. FNK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
TSCV Thrivent Small Cap Value ETF | 16.79% | 6.24% |
FNK First Trust Mid Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund | 8.15% | 7.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between TSCV and FNK is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2025 | 0.91 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TSCV vs. FNK — Risk / Return Rank
TSCV
FNK
TSCV vs. FNK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Thrivent Small Cap Value ETF (TSCV) and First Trust Mid Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund (FNK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TSCV | FNK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.41 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.34 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.39 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.94 | 0.40 | +2.54 |
Drawdowns
TSCV vs. FNK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TSCV drawdown since its inception was -10.17%, smaller than the maximum FNK drawdown of -50.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSCV and FNK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TSCV | FNK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -10.17% | -50.70% | +40.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -9.13% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -25.16% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -25.16% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -50.70% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -1.31% | +1.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.09% | -6.84% | +4.75% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.15% | — |
Volatility
TSCV vs. FNK - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TSCV | FNK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.46% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 9.71% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.76% | 15.29% | +1.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.76% | 21.05% | -4.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.76% | 23.86% | -7.10% |
TSCV vs. FNK - Expense Ratio Comparison
TSCV has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than FNK's 0.70% expense ratio.
Dividends
TSCV vs. FNK - Dividend Comparison
TSCV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.24%, less than FNK's 1.55% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FNK First Trust Mid Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund | 1.55% | 1.53% | 1.63% | 1.76% | 1.66% | 1.27% | 1.61% | 1.82% | 1.76% | 1.40% | 1.38% | 1.45% |
TSCV Thrivent Small Cap Value ETF | 0.24% | 0.28% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.91, TSCV and FNK move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, TSCV is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TSCV is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for FNK.
FNK has the higher dividend yield at 1.55%, compared with 0.24% for TSCV.
They also come from different issuers: Thrivent and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for TSCV and 0.70% for FNK.
Find the right allocation for TSCV and FNK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer