PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TSCM vs. BPH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TSCM vs. BPH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TimesSquare Quality Mid Cap Growth ETF (TSCM) and BP p.l.c. ADRhedged ETF (BPH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


TSCM

1D
-0.92%
1M
5.27%
YTD
3.31%
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BPH

1D
1.20%
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TSCM vs. BPH - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between TSCM and BPH is -0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 27, 2026

-0.03

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TSCM vs. BPH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TimesSquare Quality Mid Cap Growth ETF (TSCM) and BP p.l.c. ADRhedged ETF (BPH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

TSCM vs. BPH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TSCMBPHDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.28

9.48

-9.20

Drawdowns

TSCM vs. BPH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TSCM drawdown since its inception was -14.87%, which is greater than BPH's maximum drawdown of -2.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSCM and BPH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TSCMBPHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.87%

-2.35%

-12.52%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.92%

0.00%

-0.92%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.33%

-1.08%

-5.25%

Volatility

TSCM vs. BPH - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TSCMBPHDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.03%

25.75%

-4.72%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.03%

25.75%

-4.72%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.03%

25.75%

-4.72%

TSCM vs. BPH - Expense Ratio Comparison

TSCM has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than BPH's 0.19% expense ratio.


Dividends

TSCM vs. BPH - Dividend Comparison

Neither TSCM nor BPH has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


TSCM and BPH have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, BPH is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BPH is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for TSCM.

TSCM and BPH have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

TSCM is categorized as Mid Cap Growth Equities, while BPH is Oil & Gas. They also come from different issuers: TimesSquare Capital Management and Precidian. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for TSCM and 0.19% for BPH.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TSCM and BPH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer