BPH vs. OILK

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

BPH (BP p.l.c. ADRhedged ETF) and OILK (ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BPH is a Energy Equities fund actively managed by Precidian, while OILK is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the Bloomberg Commodity Balanced WTI Crude Oil Index. BPH is actively managed, while OILK is passively managed. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BPH charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for OILK.

Performance

BPH vs. OILK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BP p.l.c. ADRhedged ETF (BPH) and ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF (OILK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

BPH

• 1D: 1.34%
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

OILK

• 1D: -0.59%
• 1M: -13.38%
• YTD: 40.78%
• 6M: 38.63%
• 1Y: 27.24%
• 3Y*: 13.91%
• 5Y*: 13.00%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BPH vs. OILK - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
BPH BP p.l.c. ADRhedged ETF	-5.01%
OILK ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF	-13.38%

Correlation

The correlation between BPH and OILK is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 26, 2026	0.60

Return for Risk

BPH vs. OILK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BPH

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

OILK

OILK Risk / Return Rank: 28
OILK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 28
OILK Sortino Ratio Rank: 27
OILK Omega Ratio Rank: 27
OILK Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
OILK Martin Ratio Rank: 27

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BPH vs. OILK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BP p.l.c. ADRhedged ETF (BPH) and ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF (OILK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BPH	OILK	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	0.96	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	1.42	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.18	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	1.57	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	3.49	—

Drawdowns

BPH vs. OILK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BPH drawdown since its inception was -9.43%, smaller than the maximum OILK drawdown of -83.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BPH and OILK.

Drawdown Indicators

	BPH	OILK	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-9.43%	-83.76%	+74.33%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-17.41%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-23.42%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-34.69%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-8.21%	-17.41%	+9.20%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.89%	-32.48%	+29.59%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	7.86%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	BPH	OILK	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	8.02%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	24.07%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	24.73%	29.00%	-4.27%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	24.73%	30.27%	-5.54%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.73%	35.96%	-11.23%

BPH vs. OILK - Expense Ratio Comparison

BPH has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than OILK's 0.68% expense ratio.

Dividends

BPH vs. OILK - Dividend Comparison

BPH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.53%, less than OILK's 9.54% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
BPH BP p.l.c. ADRhedged ETF	0.53%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
OILK ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF	9.54%	4.79%	3.11%	5.80%	17.32%	68.82%	0.13%	0.94%	0.58%	6.17%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BPH and OILK in my portfolio?

BPH and OILK have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, BPH or OILK?

On fees, BPH is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, BPH or OILK?

BPH is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for OILK.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BPH or OILK?

OILK has the higher dividend yield at 9.54%, compared with 0.53% for BPH.

What is the main difference between BPH and OILK?

BPH is categorized as Energy Equities, while OILK is Oil & Gas. They also come from different issuers: Precidian and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for BPH and 0.68% for OILK.