PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BPH vs. OILK
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

BPH vs. OILK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BP p.l.c. ADRhedged ETF (BPH) and ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF (OILK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

BPH vs. OILK - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
BPH
BP p.l.c. ADRhedged ETF
37.33%6.33%
OILK
ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF
46.13%-14.21%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BPH achieves a 37.33% return, which is significantly lower than OILK's 46.13% return.


BPH

1D
-1.40%
1M
21.65%
YTD
37.33%
6M
39.70%
1Y
40.77%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

OILK

1D
-4.10%
1M
25.62%
YTD
46.13%
6M
36.81%
1Y
28.65%
3Y*
13.30%
5Y*
17.74%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


BPH vs. OILK - Expense Ratio Comparison

BPH has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than OILK's 0.68% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

BPH vs. OILK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BPH
BPH Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
BPH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BPH Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
BPH Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
BPH Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
BPH Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank

OILK
OILK Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
OILK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OILK Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
OILK Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
OILK Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
OILK Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BPH vs. OILK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BP p.l.c. ADRhedged ETF (BPH) and ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF (OILK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BPHOILKDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.38

1.00

+0.39

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.80

1.45

+0.34

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.19

+0.07

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.82

1.86

-0.04

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.64

3.27

+1.37

BPH vs. OILK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BPH Sharpe Ratio is 1.38, which is higher than the OILK Sharpe Ratio of 1.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BPH and OILK, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BPHOILKDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.38

1.00

+0.39

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.26

0.08

+1.18

Correlation

The correlation between BPH and OILK is 0.57, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

BPH vs. OILK - Dividend Comparison

BPH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.85%, less than OILK's 2.67% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
BPH
BP p.l.c. ADRhedged ETF
1.85%1.74%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
OILK
ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF
2.67%4.79%3.11%5.80%17.32%68.82%0.13%0.94%0.58%6.17%

Drawdowns

BPH vs. OILK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BPH drawdown since its inception was -26.32%, smaller than the maximum OILK drawdown of -83.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BPH and OILK.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


BPHOILKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.32%

-83.76%

+57.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-22.40%

-17.35%

-5.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.40%

-12.04%

+10.64%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.53%

-33.09%

+25.56%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.79%

9.86%

-1.07%

Volatility

BPH vs. OILK - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BP p.l.c. ADRhedged ETF (BPH) is 8.41%, while ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF (OILK) has a volatility of 12.23%. This indicates that BPH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than OILK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


BPHOILKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.41%

12.23%

-3.82%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.41%

20.23%

-0.82%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

29.54%

29.05%

+0.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.80%

29.85%

-1.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.80%

35.99%

-7.19%