TSCM vs. FTSM
TSCM (TimesSquare Quality Mid Cap Growth ETF) and FTSM (First Trust Enhanced Short Maturity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TSCM is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by TimesSquare Capital Management, while FTSM is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by First Trust. Both are actively managed. At a 0.17 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TSCM charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.44%/yr for FTSM.
Performance
TSCM vs. FTSM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TSCM achieves a 3.31% return, which is significantly higher than FTSM's 1.43% return.
TSCM
- 1D
- -0.92%
- 1M
- 5.27%
- YTD
- 3.31%
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FTSM
- 1D
- -0.05%
- 1M
- 0.33%
- YTD
- 1.43%
- 6M
- 1.77%
- 1Y
- 4.16%
- 3Y*
- 4.84%
- 5Y*
- 3.45%
- 10Y*
- 2.54%
TSCM vs. FTSM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
TSCM TimesSquare Quality Mid Cap Growth ETF | 3.31% | -0.86% |
FTSM First Trust Enhanced Short Maturity ETF | 1.43% | 0.03% |
Correlation
The correlation between TSCM and FTSM is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 31, 2025 | 0.17 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TSCM vs. FTSM — Risk / Return Rank
TSCM
FTSM
TSCM vs. FTSM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TimesSquare Quality Mid Cap Growth ETF (TSCM) and First Trust Enhanced Short Maturity ETF (FTSM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TSCM | FTSM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 8.78 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 7.02 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 2.89 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.28 | 1.96 | -1.68 |
Drawdowns
TSCM vs. FTSM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TSCM drawdown since its inception was -14.87%, which is greater than FTSM's maximum drawdown of -4.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSCM and FTSM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TSCM | FTSM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.87% | -4.12% | -10.75% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -0.12% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -0.15% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -0.65% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -4.12% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.92% | -0.05% | -0.87% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.33% | -0.22% | -6.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.02% | — |
Volatility
TSCM vs. FTSM - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TSCM | FTSM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.16% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 0.35% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.03% | 0.48% | +20.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.03% | 0.49% | +20.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.03% | 0.88% | +20.15% |
TSCM vs. FTSM - Expense Ratio Comparison
TSCM has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than FTSM's 0.44% expense ratio.
Dividends
TSCM vs. FTSM - Dividend Comparison
TSCM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FTSM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.16%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FTSM First Trust Enhanced Short Maturity ETF | 4.16% | 4.28% | 4.91% | 4.62% | 1.62% | 0.39% | 1.20% | 2.38% | 2.14% | 1.49% | 1.03% | 0.48% |
TSCM TimesSquare Quality Mid Cap Growth ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TSCM and FTSM have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FTSM is cheaper at 0.44% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FTSM is cheaper with a 0.44% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for TSCM.
FTSM has the higher dividend yield at 4.16%, compared with 0.00% for TSCM.
TSCM is categorized as Mid Cap Growth Equities, while FTSM is Ultrashort Bond. They also come from different issuers: TimesSquare Capital Management and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for TSCM and 0.44% for FTSM.
Find the right allocation for TSCM and FTSM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer