TSCGX vs. SSCPX

Last updated Aug 5, 2026

TSCGX (Thrivent Small Cap Growth Fund) and SSCPX (Saratoga Small Capitalization Portfolio) are both Small Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, TSCGX returned 2.69%/yr vs 8.26%/yr for SSCPX. Their correlation of 0.85 means they have usually moved in the same direction. TSCGX charges 1.21%/yr vs 1.70%/yr for SSCPX.

Performance

TSCGX vs. SSCPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Thrivent Small Cap Growth Fund (TSCGX) and Saratoga Small Capitalization Portfolio (SSCPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TSCGX achieves a 18.93% return, which is significantly lower than SSCPX's 21.02% return.

TSCGX

• 1D: 2.73%
• 1M: -2.24%
• 6M: 13.56%
• YTD: 18.93%
• 1Y: 22.53%
• 3Y*: 10.63%
• 5Y*: 2.69%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 10.34%

SSCPX

• 1D: 1.84%
• 1M: -3.49%
• 6M: 12.94%
• YTD: 21.02%
• 1Y: 29.71%
• 3Y*: 15.22%
• 5Y*: 8.26%
• 10Y*: 10.82%
• ALL TIME*: 8.49%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
SSCPX Saratoga Small Capitalization Portfolio	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
TSCGX Thrivent Small Cap Growth Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

TSCGX vs. SSCPX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
TSCGX Thrivent Small Cap Growth Fund	18.93%	1.84%	10.83%	9.90%	-22.54%	11.30%	55.07%	30.05%	-11.15%
SSCPX Saratoga Small Capitalization Portfolio	21.02%	6.41%	10.79%	15.16%	-17.56%	24.53%	25.39%	23.71%	-18.71%

Correlation

The correlation between TSCGX and SSCPX is 0.92, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.92
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.92
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.91
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 19, 2018	0.85

The correlation between TSCGX and SSCPX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

TSCGX vs. SSCPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

TSCGX

TSCGX Risk / Return Rank: 37
TSCGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 32
TSCGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 34
TSCGX Omega Ratio Rank: 30
TSCGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 50
TSCGX Martin Ratio Rank: 41

SSCPX

SSCPX Risk / Return Rank: 55
SSCPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 49
SSCPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 50
SSCPX Omega Ratio Rank: 41
SSCPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
SSCPX Martin Ratio Rank: 56

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

TSCGX vs. SSCPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Thrivent Small Cap Growth Fund (TSCGX) and Saratoga Small Capitalization Portfolio (SSCPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	TSCGX	SSCPX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.19	1.53	-0.34
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.81	2.22	-0.41
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.21	1.26	-0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.10	2.77	-0.67
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.57	8.36	-1.78

TSCGX vs. SSCPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TSCGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.19, which is comparable to the SSCPX Sharpe Ratio of 1.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TSCGX and SSCPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

TSCGX vs. SSCPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TSCGX drawdown since its inception was -38.84%, smaller than the maximum SSCPX drawdown of -53.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSCGX and SSCPX.

Drawdown Indicators

	TSCGX	SSCPX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-38.84%	-53.65%	+14.81%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.66%	-11.54%	-0.12%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-27.59%	-27.78%	+0.19%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-38.84%	-27.78%	-11.06%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-43.59%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.54%	-6.75%	+2.21%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.88%	-10.21%	-2.67%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.71%	3.81%	-0.10%

Volatility

TSCGX vs. SSCPX - Volatility Comparison

Thrivent Small Cap Growth Fund (TSCGX) and Saratoga Small Capitalization Portfolio (SSCPX) have volatilities of 6.30% and 6.02%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TSCGX	SSCPX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.30%	6.02%	+0.28%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.26%	16.05%	+0.21%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.55%	20.85%	-0.30%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.99%	22.24%	+1.75%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.41%	23.07%	+1.34%

TSCGX vs. SSCPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TSCGX has a 1.21% expense ratio, which is lower than SSCPX's 1.70% expense ratio.

Dividends

TSCGX vs. SSCPX - Dividend Comparison

TSCGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.78%, less than SSCPX's 7.45% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
SSCPX Saratoga Small Capitalization Portfolio	7.45%	9.02%	11.37%	0.00%	10.18%	24.67%	0.02%	0.00%	17.42%	0.00%	0.00%	58.90%
TSCGX Thrivent Small Cap Growth Fund	0.78%	0.87%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	2.39%	2.20%	0.50%	2.27%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TSCGX and SSCPX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.92, TSCGX and SSCPX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, TSCGX or SSCPX?

TSCGX has higher volatility (6.30%) compared to SSCPX (6.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TSCGX dropped -38.84% vs SSCPX's -53.65%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SSCPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.53 vs 1.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.