PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SSCPX vs. ALMAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SSCPX vs. ALMAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Saratoga Small Capitalization Portfolio (SSCPX) and Alger Weatherbie Specialized Growth Fund (ALMAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SSCPX achieves a 25.84% return, which is significantly higher than ALMAX's 9.47% return. Over the past 10 years, SSCPX has outperformed ALMAX with an annualized return of 11.71%, while ALMAX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.27% annualized return.


SSCPX

1D
2.13%
1M
7.08%
YTD
25.84%
6M
21.92%
1Y
40.73%
3Y*
18.13%
5Y*
9.71%
10Y*
11.71%

ALMAX

1D
2.35%
1M
6.49%
YTD
9.47%
6M
5.68%
1Y
18.66%
3Y*
8.86%
5Y*
-3.10%
10Y*
9.27%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SSCPX vs. ALMAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SSCPX
Saratoga Small Capitalization Portfolio
25.84%6.41%10.79%15.16%-17.56%24.53%25.39%23.71%-16.14%15.58%
ALMAX
Alger Weatherbie Specialized Growth Fund
9.47%0.50%13.78%11.22%-38.11%5.83%56.85%39.17%-4.10%21.83%

Correlation

The correlation between SSCPX and ALMAX is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.87

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.87

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2003

0.87

The correlation between SSCPX and ALMAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SSCPX vs. ALMAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SSCPX
SSCPX Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
SSCPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SSCPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
SSCPX Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
SSCPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
SSCPX Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

ALMAX
ALMAX Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
ALMAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ALMAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
ALMAX Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
ALMAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
ALMAX Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SSCPX vs. ALMAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Saratoga Small Capitalization Portfolio (SSCPX) and Alger Weatherbie Specialized Growth Fund (ALMAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SSCPXALMAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.21

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.50

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.15

+0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.51

0.85

+2.66

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.93

2.59

+9.35

SSCPX vs. ALMAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SSCPX Sharpe Ratio is 2.00, which is higher than the ALMAX Sharpe Ratio of 0.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SSCPX and ALMAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SSCPX vs. ALMAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SSCPX drawdown since its inception was -53.65%, smaller than the maximum ALMAX drawdown of -60.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SSCPX and ALMAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SSCPXALMAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.65%

-60.51%

+6.86%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.54%

-20.91%

+9.37%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.78%

-29.61%

+1.83%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.78%

-53.89%

+26.11%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.59%

-53.89%

+10.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-28.92%

+28.92%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.24%

-17.35%

+7.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.39%

6.84%

-3.45%

Volatility

SSCPX vs. ALMAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Saratoga Small Capitalization Portfolio (SSCPX) is 6.44%, while Alger Weatherbie Specialized Growth Fund (ALMAX) has a volatility of 7.52%. This indicates that SSCPX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ALMAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SSCPXALMAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.44%

7.52%

-1.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.25%

17.91%

-2.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.23%

22.41%

-2.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.24%

29.28%

-7.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.04%

27.31%

-4.27%

SSCPX vs. ALMAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SSCPX has a 1.70% expense ratio, which is higher than ALMAX's 1.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

SSCPX vs. ALMAX - Dividend Comparison

SSCPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.16%, while ALMAX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ALMAX
Alger Weatherbie Specialized Growth Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%24.48%4.64%4.00%9.86%0.00%12.44%55.85%
SSCPX
Saratoga Small Capitalization Portfolio
7.16%9.02%11.37%0.00%10.18%24.67%0.02%0.00%17.42%0.00%0.00%58.90%

Frequently Asked Questions


SSCPX and ALMAX have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ALMAX has higher volatility (7.52%) compared to SSCPX (6.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SSCPX dropped -53.65% vs ALMAX's -60.51%.

SSCPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.00 vs 0.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SSCPX and ALMAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer