TSCGX vs. IWO

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

TSCGX (Thrivent Small Cap Growth Fund) and IWO (iShares Russell 2000 Growth ETF) are both Small Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, TSCGX returned 4.04%/yr vs 5.56%/yr for IWO. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. TSCGX charges 1.21%/yr vs 0.24%/yr for IWO.

Performance

TSCGX vs. IWO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Thrivent Small Cap Growth Fund (TSCGX) and iShares Russell 2000 Growth ETF (IWO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TSCGX achieves a 18.27% return, which is significantly higher than IWO's 16.75% return.

TSCGX

• 1D: 1.64%
• 1M: 8.48%
• YTD: 18.27%
• 6M: 17.10%
• 1Y: 27.60%
• 3Y*: 12.78%
• 5Y*: 4.04%
• 10Y*: —

IWO

• 1D: -1.41%
• 1M: 4.28%
• YTD: 16.75%
• 6M: 15.06%
• 1Y: 37.09%
• 3Y*: 18.01%
• 5Y*: 5.56%
• 10Y*: 11.23%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TSCGX vs. IWO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
TSCGX Thrivent Small Cap Growth Fund	18.27%	1.84%	10.83%	9.90%	-22.54%	11.30%	55.07%	30.05%	-11.15%
IWO iShares Russell 2000 Growth ETF	16.75%	12.90%	15.04%	18.51%	-26.27%	2.54%	34.68%	28.48%	-13.85%

Correlation

The correlation between TSCGX and IWO is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.91
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.93
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.95
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 20, 2018	0.89

The correlation between TSCGX and IWO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

TSCGX vs. IWO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TSCGX

TSCGX Risk / Return Rank: 34
TSCGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 29
TSCGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 29
TSCGX Omega Ratio Rank: 26
TSCGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
TSCGX Martin Ratio Rank: 41

IWO

IWO Risk / Return Rank: 49
IWO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 50
IWO Sortino Ratio Rank: 49
IWO Omega Ratio Rank: 45
IWO Calmar Ratio Rank: 50
IWO Martin Ratio Rank: 52

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TSCGX vs. IWO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Thrivent Small Cap Growth Fund (TSCGX) and iShares Russell 2000 Growth ETF (IWO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	TSCGX	IWO	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.55	1.75	-0.20
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.24	2.42	-0.18
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.27	1.29	-0.02
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.53	2.51	+0.03
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	8.80	8.99	-0.19
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

TSCGX vs. IWO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TSCGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.55, which is comparable to the IWO Sharpe Ratio of 1.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TSCGX and IWO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TSCGX	IWO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.55	1.75	-0.20
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.17	0.23	-0.06
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.47	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.43	0.28	+0.15

Drawdowns

TSCGX vs. IWO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TSCGX drawdown since its inception was -38.84%, smaller than the maximum IWO drawdown of -60.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSCGX and IWO.

Drawdown Indicators

	TSCGX	IWO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-38.84%	-60.11%	+21.27%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.66%	-14.87%	+3.21%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-27.59%	-28.57%	+0.98%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-38.84%	-40.51%	+1.67%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-42.02%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-1.51%	+1.51%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-13.09%	-16.71%	+3.62%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.35%	4.14%	-0.79%

Volatility

TSCGX vs. IWO - Volatility Comparison

Thrivent Small Cap Growth Fund (TSCGX) and iShares Russell 2000 Growth ETF (IWO) have volatilities of 6.33% and 6.61%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TSCGX	IWO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.33%	6.61%	-0.28%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.79%	15.65%	-0.86%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.10%	21.34%	-2.24%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.78%	24.48%	-0.70%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.45%	24.13%	+0.32%

TSCGX vs. IWO - Expense Ratio Comparison

TSCGX has a 1.21% expense ratio, which is higher than IWO's 0.24% expense ratio.

Dividends

TSCGX vs. IWO - Dividend Comparison

TSCGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.73%, more than IWO's 0.40% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
IWO iShares Russell 2000 Growth ETF	0.40%	0.56%	0.80%	0.73%	0.73%	0.32%	0.44%	0.71%	0.76%	0.73%	0.97%	0.89%
TSCGX Thrivent Small Cap Growth Fund	0.73%	0.87%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	2.39%	2.20%	0.50%	2.27%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TSCGX and IWO in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.91, TSCGX and IWO move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, TSCGX or IWO?

IWO has higher volatility (6.61%) compared to TSCGX (6.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TSCGX dropped -38.84% vs IWO's -60.11%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

IWO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.75 vs 1.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.