PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
TSCGX vs. NEAGX
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Key characteristics


TSCGXNEAGX
YTD Return17.16%17.00%
1Y Return38.59%34.33%
3Y Return (Ann)-3.66%2.84%
5Y Return (Ann)11.44%18.61%
Sharpe Ratio1.921.49
Sortino Ratio2.722.16
Omega Ratio1.331.26
Calmar Ratio1.041.75
Martin Ratio10.055.73
Ulcer Index3.66%5.86%
Daily Std Dev19.19%22.50%
Max Drawdown-40.25%-53.03%
Current Drawdown-10.63%-5.68%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.9

The correlation between TSCGX and NEAGX is 0.85, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Performance

TSCGX vs. NEAGX - Performance Comparison

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with TSCGX having a 17.16% return and NEAGX slightly lower at 17.00%. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-10.00%-5.00%0.00%5.00%10.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
11.14%
-0.86%
TSCGX
NEAGX

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


TSCGX vs. NEAGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TSCGX has a 1.21% expense ratio, which is lower than NEAGX's 1.86% expense ratio.


NEAGX
Needham Aggressive Growth Fund
Expense ratio chart for NEAGX: current value at 1.86% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%1.86%
Expense ratio chart for TSCGX: current value at 1.21% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%1.21%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

TSCGX vs. NEAGX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Thrivent Small Cap Growth Fund (TSCGX) and Needham Aggressive Growth Fund (NEAGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TSCGX
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for TSCGX, currently valued at 1.92, compared to the broader market0.002.004.001.92
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for TSCGX, currently valued at 2.72, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.002.72
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for TSCGX, currently valued at 1.33, compared to the broader market1.002.003.004.001.33
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for TSCGX, currently valued at 1.04, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.0020.0025.001.04
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for TSCGX, currently valued at 10.05, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.0010.05
NEAGX
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for NEAGX, currently valued at 1.49, compared to the broader market0.002.004.001.49
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for NEAGX, currently valued at 2.16, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.002.16
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for NEAGX, currently valued at 1.26, compared to the broader market1.002.003.004.001.26
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for NEAGX, currently valued at 1.75, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.0020.0025.001.75
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for NEAGX, currently valued at 5.73, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.005.73

TSCGX vs. NEAGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TSCGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.92, which is comparable to the NEAGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TSCGX and NEAGX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.000.501.001.502.002.503.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
1.92
1.49
TSCGX
NEAGX

Dividends

TSCGX vs. NEAGX - Dividend Comparison

Neither TSCGX nor NEAGX has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

TSCGX vs. NEAGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TSCGX drawdown since its inception was -40.25%, smaller than the maximum NEAGX drawdown of -53.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSCGX and NEAGX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-10.63%
-5.68%
TSCGX
NEAGX

Volatility

TSCGX vs. NEAGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Thrivent Small Cap Growth Fund (TSCGX) is 6.66%, while Needham Aggressive Growth Fund (NEAGX) has a volatility of 7.07%. This indicates that TSCGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NEAGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%7.00%8.00%9.00%10.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
6.66%
7.07%
TSCGX
NEAGX