TSCGX vs. TMSIX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

TSCGX (Thrivent Small Cap Growth Fund) and TMSIX (Thrivent Mid Cap Stock Fund Class S) are both mutual funds - TSCGX is a Small Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Thrivent, while TMSIX is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund managed by Thrivent. Over the past 5 years, TSCGX returned 4.04%/yr vs 7.00%/yr for TMSIX. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. TSCGX charges 1.21%/yr vs 0.74%/yr for TMSIX.

Performance

TSCGX vs. TMSIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Thrivent Small Cap Growth Fund (TSCGX) and Thrivent Mid Cap Stock Fund Class S (TMSIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TSCGX achieves a 18.27% return, which is significantly higher than TMSIX's 15.19% return.

TSCGX

• 1D: 1.64%
• 1M: 8.48%
• YTD: 18.27%
• 6M: 17.10%
• 1Y: 27.60%
• 3Y*: 12.78%
• 5Y*: 4.04%
• 10Y*: —

TMSIX

• 1D: 0.70%
• 1M: 4.85%
• YTD: 15.19%
• 6M: 14.64%
• 1Y: 20.73%
• 3Y*: 14.71%
• 5Y*: 7.00%
• 10Y*: 12.29%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TSCGX vs. TMSIX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
TSCGX Thrivent Small Cap Growth Fund	18.27%	1.84%	10.83%	9.90%	-22.54%	11.30%	55.07%	30.05%	-11.15%
TMSIX Thrivent Mid Cap Stock Fund Class S	15.19%	4.64%	14.08%	13.90%	-17.68%	28.06%	21.96%	24.88%	-11.99%

Correlation

The correlation between TSCGX and TMSIX is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.88
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.91
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.92
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 20, 2018	0.84

The correlation between TSCGX and TMSIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

TSCGX vs. TMSIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TSCGX

TSCGX Risk / Return Rank: 34
TSCGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 29
TSCGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 29
TSCGX Omega Ratio Rank: 26
TSCGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
TSCGX Martin Ratio Rank: 41

TMSIX

TMSIX Risk / Return Rank: 34
TMSIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 29
TMSIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 29
TMSIX Omega Ratio Rank: 28
TMSIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 42
TMSIX Martin Ratio Rank: 41

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TSCGX vs. TMSIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Thrivent Small Cap Growth Fund (TSCGX) and Thrivent Mid Cap Stock Fund Class S (TMSIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	TSCGX	TMSIX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.55	1.54	+0.01
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.24	2.24	0.00
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.27	1.27	-0.01
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.53	2.44	+0.09
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	8.80	8.82	-0.02
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

TSCGX vs. TMSIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TSCGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.55, which is comparable to the TMSIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TSCGX and TMSIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TSCGX	TMSIX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.55	1.54	+0.01
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.17	0.34	-0.17
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.60	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.43	0.47	-0.04

Drawdowns

TSCGX vs. TMSIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TSCGX drawdown since its inception was -38.84%, smaller than the maximum TMSIX drawdown of -56.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSCGX and TMSIX.

Drawdown Indicators

	TSCGX	TMSIX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-38.84%	-56.10%	+17.26%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.66%	-8.97%	-2.69%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-27.59%	-20.18%	-7.41%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-38.84%	-31.57%	-7.27%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-40.66%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-13.09%	-10.00%	-3.09%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.35%	2.48%	+0.87%

Volatility

TSCGX vs. TMSIX - Volatility Comparison

Thrivent Small Cap Growth Fund (TSCGX) has a higher volatility of 6.33% compared to Thrivent Mid Cap Stock Fund Class S (TMSIX) at 3.52%. This indicates that TSCGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TMSIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TSCGX	TMSIX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.33%	3.52%	+2.81%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.79%	10.87%	+3.92%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.10%	14.29%	+4.81%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.78%	20.42%	+3.36%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.45%	20.46%	+3.99%

TSCGX vs. TMSIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TSCGX has a 1.21% expense ratio, which is higher than TMSIX's 0.74% expense ratio.

Dividends

TSCGX vs. TMSIX - Dividend Comparison

TSCGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.73%, less than TMSIX's 10.76% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
TMSIX Thrivent Mid Cap Stock Fund Class S	10.76%	12.39%	7.91%	1.48%	2.86%	10.77%	3.26%	2.77%	11.64%	7.92%	4.10%	11.95%
TSCGX Thrivent Small Cap Growth Fund	0.73%	0.87%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	2.39%	2.20%	0.50%	2.27%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TSCGX and TMSIX in my portfolio?

TSCGX and TMSIX have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TSCGX or TMSIX?

TSCGX has higher volatility (6.33%) compared to TMSIX (3.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TSCGX dropped -38.84% vs TMSIX's -56.10%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

TSCGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.55 vs 1.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.