TSCGX vs. AABFX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

TSCGX (Thrivent Small Cap Growth Fund) and AABFX (Thrivent Balanced Income Plus Fund) are both mutual funds - TSCGX is a Small Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Thrivent, while AABFX is a Diversified Portfolio fund managed by Thrivent. Over the past 5 years, TSCGX returned 4.04%/yr vs 5.66%/yr for AABFX. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TSCGX charges 1.21%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for AABFX.

Performance

TSCGX vs. AABFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Thrivent Small Cap Growth Fund (TSCGX) and Thrivent Balanced Income Plus Fund (AABFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TSCGX achieves a 18.27% return, which is significantly higher than AABFX's 5.63% return.

TSCGX

• 1D: 1.64%
• 1M: 8.48%
• YTD: 18.27%
• 6M: 17.10%
• 1Y: 27.60%
• 3Y*: 12.78%
• 5Y*: 4.04%
• 10Y*: —

AABFX

• 1D: 0.27%
• 1M: 2.58%
• YTD: 5.63%
• 6M: 5.92%
• 1Y: 15.32%
• 3Y*: 11.81%
• 5Y*: 5.66%
• 10Y*: 6.75%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TSCGX vs. AABFX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
TSCGX Thrivent Small Cap Growth Fund	18.27%	1.84%	10.83%	9.90%	-22.54%	11.30%	55.07%	30.05%	-11.15%
AABFX Thrivent Balanced Income Plus Fund	5.63%	12.23%	10.08%	12.04%	-13.93%	11.83%	8.69%	16.65%	-5.31%

Correlation

The correlation between TSCGX and AABFX is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.79
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.79
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.82
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 20, 2018	0.78

The correlation between TSCGX and AABFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

TSCGX vs. AABFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TSCGX

TSCGX Risk / Return Rank: 34
TSCGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 29
TSCGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 29
TSCGX Omega Ratio Rank: 26
TSCGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
TSCGX Martin Ratio Rank: 41

AABFX

AABFX Risk / Return Rank: 70
AABFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 72
AABFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 74
AABFX Omega Ratio Rank: 72
AABFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
AABFX Martin Ratio Rank: 70

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TSCGX vs. AABFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Thrivent Small Cap Growth Fund (TSCGX) and Thrivent Balanced Income Plus Fund (AABFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	TSCGX	AABFX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.55	2.47	-0.92
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.24	3.59	-1.35
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.27	1.48	-0.21
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.53	3.05	-0.51
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	8.80	13.43	-4.63
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

TSCGX vs. AABFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TSCGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.55, which is lower than the AABFX Sharpe Ratio of 2.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TSCGX and AABFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TSCGX	AABFX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.55	2.47	-0.92
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.17	0.67	-0.50
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.73	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.43	0.42	+0.01

Drawdowns

TSCGX vs. AABFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TSCGX drawdown since its inception was -38.84%, smaller than the maximum AABFX drawdown of -43.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSCGX and AABFX.

Drawdown Indicators

	TSCGX	AABFX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-38.84%	-43.44%	+4.60%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.66%	-5.13%	-6.53%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-27.59%	-7.04%	-20.55%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-38.84%	-21.56%	-17.28%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-27.40%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-13.09%	-5.64%	-7.45%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.35%	1.16%	+2.19%

Volatility

TSCGX vs. AABFX - Volatility Comparison

Thrivent Small Cap Growth Fund (TSCGX) has a higher volatility of 6.33% compared to Thrivent Balanced Income Plus Fund (AABFX) at 2.13%. This indicates that TSCGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AABFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TSCGX	AABFX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.33%	2.13%	+4.20%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.79%	5.16%	+9.63%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.10%	6.33%	+12.77%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.78%	8.53%	+15.25%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.45%	9.31%	+15.14%

TSCGX vs. AABFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TSCGX has a 1.21% expense ratio, which is higher than AABFX's 1.00% expense ratio.

Dividends

TSCGX vs. AABFX - Dividend Comparison

TSCGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.73%, less than AABFX's 6.84% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
AABFX Thrivent Balanced Income Plus Fund	6.84%	7.25%	6.43%	2.97%	2.26%	6.99%	2.03%	2.37%	9.70%	2.04%	2.37%	1.90%
TSCGX Thrivent Small Cap Growth Fund	0.73%	0.87%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	2.39%	2.20%	0.50%	2.27%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TSCGX and AABFX in my portfolio?

TSCGX and AABFX have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TSCGX or AABFX?

TSCGX has higher volatility (6.33%) compared to AABFX (2.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TSCGX dropped -38.84% vs AABFX's -43.44%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AABFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.47 vs 1.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.