PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TRUT vs. GXPT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TRUT vs. GXPT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vaneck Technology Trusector ETF (TRUT) and Global X PureCap MSCI Information Technology ETF (GXPT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TRUT achieves a 20.96% return, which is significantly lower than GXPT's 22.42% return.


TRUT

1D
4.22%
1M
5.66%
6M
25.56%
YTD
20.96%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*

GXPT

1D
4.10%
1M
5.51%
6M
27.31%
YTD
22.42%
1Y
33.58%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
35.15%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$16.87M$9.09M$5.79M
$14.52M$8.92M$6.31M

TRUT vs. GXPT - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between TRUT and GXPT is 0.99 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 21, 2025

0.99

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TRUT vs. GXPT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

TRUT

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


GXPT
GXPT Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
GXPT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GXPT Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
GXPT Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
GXPT Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
GXPT Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

TRUT vs. GXPT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vaneck Technology Trusector ETF (TRUT) and Global X PureCap MSCI Information Technology ETF (GXPT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TRUTGXPTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.80

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.72

TRUT vs. GXPT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TRUT vs. GXPT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TRUT drawdown since its inception was -18.55%, roughly equal to the maximum GXPT drawdown of -18.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRUT and GXPT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TRUTGXPTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.55%

-18.74%

+0.19%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.74%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.87%

-4.37%

-0.50%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.75%

-5.45%

-0.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.13%

Volatility

TRUT vs. GXPT - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TRUTGXPTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.65%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.70%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.13%

23.81%

+0.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.13%

23.57%

+0.56%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.13%

23.57%

+0.56%

TRUT vs. GXPT - Expense Ratio Comparison

TRUT has a 0.13% expense ratio, which is lower than GXPT's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

TRUT vs. GXPT - Dividend Comparison

TRUT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.30%, more than GXPT's 0.21% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.99, TRUT and GXPT move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, TRUT is cheaper at 0.13% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

TRUT is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for GXPT.

TRUT has the higher dividend yield at 0.30%, compared with 0.21% for GXPT.

They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.13% for TRUT and 0.15% for GXPT.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TRUT and GXPT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer