TRUT vs. DFNV
TRUT (Vaneck Technology Trusector ETF) and DFNV (TrimTabs Donoghue Forlines Risk Managed Innovation ETF) are both Technology Equities funds. TRUT is actively managed, while DFNV is passively managed. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TRUT charges 0.13%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for DFNV.
Performance
TRUT vs. DFNV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TRUT achieves a 16.13% return, which is significantly higher than DFNV's -4.71% return.
TRUT
- 1D
- -3.32%
- 1M
- -1.31%
- YTD
- 16.13%
- 6M
- 14.91%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DFNV
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- -4.47%
- YTD
- -4.71%
- 6M
- -6.49%
- 1Y
- -0.49%
- 3Y*
- 15.74%
- 5Y*
- 7.20%
- 10Y*
- —
TRUT vs. DFNV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
TRUT Vaneck Technology Trusector ETF | 16.13% | 9.76% |
DFNV TrimTabs Donoghue Forlines Risk Managed Innovation ETF | -4.71% | 2.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between TRUT and DFNV is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 21, 2025 | 0.63 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TRUT vs. DFNV — Risk / Return Rank
TRUT
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
DFNV
TRUT vs. DFNV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vaneck Technology Trusector ETF (TRUT) and TrimTabs Donoghue Forlines Risk Managed Innovation ETF (DFNV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TRUT | DFNV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.01 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | -0.02 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | -0.05 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TRUT vs. DFNV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TRUT drawdown since its inception was -18.55%, smaller than the maximum DFNV drawdown of -29.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRUT and DFNV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TRUT | DFNV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.55% | -29.71% | +11.16% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -21.54% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -22.72% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -29.71% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.67% | -11.09% | +2.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.27% | -9.46% | +4.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 9.12% | — |
Volatility
TRUT vs. DFNV - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TRUT | DFNV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 7.72% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 15.32% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.21% | 18.09% | +5.12% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.21% | 19.74% | +3.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.21% | 19.73% | +3.48% |
TRUT vs. DFNV - Expense Ratio Comparison
TRUT has a 0.13% expense ratio, which is lower than DFNV's 0.69% expense ratio.
Dividends
TRUT vs. DFNV - Dividend Comparison
TRUT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.20%, less than DFNV's 0.40% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFNV TrimTabs Donoghue Forlines Risk Managed Innovation ETF | 0.40% | 0.38% | 1.28% | 0.77% | 1.20% | 4.77% | 0.02% |
TRUT Vaneck Technology Trusector ETF | 0.20% | 0.14% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TRUT and DFNV have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TRUT is cheaper at 0.13% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TRUT is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for DFNV.
DFNV has the higher dividend yield at 0.40%, compared with 0.20% for TRUT.
They also come from different issuers: VanEck and TrimTabs. Their fees differ too: 0.13% for TRUT and 0.69% for DFNV.
Find the right allocation for TRUT and DFNV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer