TRUT vs. DFNV

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

TRUT (Vaneck Technology Trusector ETF) and DFNV (TrimTabs Donoghue Forlines Risk Managed Innovation ETF) are both Technology Equities funds. TRUT is actively managed, while DFNV is passively managed. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TRUT charges 0.13%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for DFNV.

Performance

TRUT vs. DFNV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vaneck Technology Trusector ETF (TRUT) and TrimTabs Donoghue Forlines Risk Managed Innovation ETF (DFNV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TRUT achieves a 25.30% return, which is significantly higher than DFNV's 2.99% return.

TRUT

• 1D: -1.46%
• 1M: 16.68%
• YTD: 25.30%
• 6M: 24.37%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

DFNV

• 1D: -2.01%
• 1M: 11.80%
• YTD: 2.99%
• 6M: 1.14%
• 1Y: 7.73%
• 3Y*: 19.01%
• 5Y*: 9.69%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TRUT vs. DFNV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
TRUT Vaneck Technology Trusector ETF	25.30%	10.16%
DFNV TrimTabs Donoghue Forlines Risk Managed Innovation ETF	2.99%	3.16%

Correlation

The correlation between TRUT and DFNV is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 22, 2025	0.62

Return for Risk

TRUT vs. DFNV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DFNV

DFNV Risk / Return Rank: 14
DFNV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 15
DFNV Sortino Ratio Rank: 15
DFNV Omega Ratio Rank: 15
DFNV Calmar Ratio Rank: 13
DFNV Martin Ratio Rank: 13

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TRUT vs. DFNV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vaneck Technology Trusector ETF (TRUT) and TrimTabs Donoghue Forlines Risk Managed Innovation ETF (DFNV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TRUT	DFNV	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	0.44	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.50	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	2.39	0.54	+1.85

Drawdowns

TRUT vs. DFNV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TRUT drawdown since its inception was -18.55%, smaller than the maximum DFNV drawdown of -29.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRUT and DFNV.

Drawdown Indicators

	TRUT	DFNV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-18.55%	-29.71%	+11.16%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-21.54%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-22.72%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-29.71%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.46%	-3.91%	+2.45%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.17%	-9.47%	+4.30%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	8.90%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	TRUT	DFNV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	6.59%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	14.86%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	21.53%	17.69%	+3.84%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.53%	19.66%	+1.87%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.53%	19.73%	+1.80%

TRUT vs. DFNV - Expense Ratio Comparison

TRUT has a 0.13% expense ratio, which is lower than DFNV's 0.69% expense ratio.

Dividends

TRUT vs. DFNV - Dividend Comparison

TRUT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.19%, less than DFNV's 0.37% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
DFNV TrimTabs Donoghue Forlines Risk Managed Innovation ETF	0.37%	0.38%	1.28%	0.77%	1.20%	4.77%	0.02%
TRUT Vaneck Technology Trusector ETF	0.19%	0.14%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TRUT and DFNV in my portfolio?

TRUT and DFNV have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, TRUT or DFNV?

On fees, TRUT is cheaper at 0.13% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, TRUT or DFNV?

TRUT is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for DFNV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TRUT or DFNV?

DFNV has the higher dividend yield at 0.37%, compared with 0.19% for TRUT.

What is the main difference between TRUT and DFNV?

They also come from different issuers: VanEck and TrimTabs. Their fees differ too: 0.13% for TRUT and 0.69% for DFNV.