TRUF vs. VFH
TRUF (VanEck Financials TruSector ETF) and VFH (Vanguard Financials ETF) are both Financials Equities funds. With a 0.98 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. TRUF charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for VFH.
Performance
TRUF vs. VFH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
TRUF
- 1D
- 0.15%
- 1M
- 4.55%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VFH
- 1D
- 0.22%
- 1M
- 4.69%
- YTD
- -0.35%
- 6M
- -1.44%
- 1Y
- 6.33%
- 3Y*
- 19.74%
- 5Y*
- 10.05%
- 10Y*
- 13.16%
TRUF vs. VFH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
TRUF VanEck Financials TruSector ETF | 10.01% |
VFH Vanguard Financials ETF | 9.73% |
Correlation
The correlation between TRUF and VFH is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 2026 | 0.98 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TRUF vs. VFH — Risk / Return Rank
TRUF
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
VFH
TRUF vs. VFH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Financials TruSector ETF (TRUF) and Vanguard Financials ETF (VFH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TRUF | VFH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.08 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 0.43 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 1.11 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TRUF vs. VFH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TRUF drawdown since its inception was -3.24%, smaller than the maximum VFH drawdown of -78.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRUF and VFH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TRUF | VFH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -3.24% | -78.61% | +75.37% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -14.75% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -17.30% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -25.66% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -44.42% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.74% | -3.38% | +2.64% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.20% | -18.50% | +17.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 5.69% | — |
Volatility
TRUF vs. VFH - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TRUF | VFH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.08% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 11.35% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.17% | 14.85% | -1.68% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.17% | 19.24% | -6.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.17% | 22.46% | -9.29% |
TRUF vs. VFH - Expense Ratio Comparison
TRUF has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is higher than VFH's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
TRUF vs. VFH - Dividend Comparison
TRUF has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VFH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.76%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TRUF VanEck Financials TruSector ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VFH Vanguard Financials ETF | 1.76% | 1.55% | 1.75% | 2.08% | 2.31% | 1.87% | 2.21% | 2.17% | 2.30% | 1.53% | 1.63% | 2.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.98, TRUF and VFH move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, VFH is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VFH is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for TRUF.
VFH has the higher dividend yield at 1.76%, compared with 0.00% for TRUF.
They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for TRUF and 0.09% for VFH.
Find the right allocation for TRUF and VFH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer