PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
TRUD vs. BETZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

TRUD vs. BETZ

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

TRUD (VanEck Consumer Discretionary TruSector ETF) and BETZ (Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF) are both Consumer Discretionary Equities funds. TRUD is actively managed, while BETZ is passively managed. At a 0.46 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TRUD charges 0.16%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for BETZ.

Performance

TRUD vs. BETZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Consumer Discretionary TruSector ETF (TRUD) and Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF (BETZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TRUD achieves a -3.87% return, which is significantly higher than BETZ's -11.53% return.

TRUD

1D
-0.80%
1M
-6.30%
YTD
-3.87%
6M
-5.99%
1Y
—
3Y*
—
5Y*
—
10Y*
—

BETZ

1D
-1.22%
1M
0.68%
YTD
-11.53%
6M
-11.64%
1Y
-15.81%
3Y*
4.99%
5Y*
-8.77%
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TRUD vs. BETZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)2025
TRUD
VanEck Consumer Discretionary TruSector ETF		-3.87%6.58%
BETZ
Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF		-11.53%-9.73%

Correlation

The correlation between TRUD and BETZ is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 21, 2025

0.46

TRUD vs. BETZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
TRUD
BETZ

Financial Services

52.0%
0.0%

Consumer Cyclical

47.6%
96.0%

Communication Services

0.3%
1.1%

Technology

0.2%
2.9%

Industrials

0.0%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Financial Services

TRUD
52.0%
BETZ
0.0%

Consumer Cyclical

TRUD
47.6%
BETZ
96.0%

Communication Services

TRUD
0.3%
BETZ
1.1%

Technology

TRUD
0.2%
BETZ
2.9%

Industrials

TRUD
0.0%
BETZ

-

Basic Materials

TRUD

-

BETZ

-

Consumer Defensive

TRUD

-

BETZ

-

Energy

TRUD

-

BETZ

-

Healthcare

TRUD

-

BETZ

-

Real Estate

TRUD

-

BETZ

-

Utilities

TRUD

-

BETZ

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

VanEck Consumer Discretionary TruSector ETF

Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF

Often compared with TRUD:
TRUD vs. GXPDTRUD vs. MOATTRUD vs. REMXTRUD vs. IYCTRUD vs. DVXYTRUD vs. TMHTRUD vs. XLY
Often compared with BETZ:
BETZ vs. FDISBETZ vs. ODDSBETZ vs. MGMBETZ vs. HTECBETZ vs. SPYBETZ vs. QQQBETZ vs. BRK-B

Return for Risk

TRUD vs. BETZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
TRUD

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

BETZ
BETZ Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
BETZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BETZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
BETZ Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
BETZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
BETZ Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TRUD vs. BETZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Consumer Discretionary TruSector ETF (TRUD) and Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF (BETZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

TRUDBETZDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

—

-0.77

—

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

—

-0.99

—

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

—

0.89

—

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

—

-0.54

—

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

—

-0.90

—

TRUD vs. BETZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TRUD vs. BETZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TRUD drawdown since its inception was -15.96%, smaller than the maximum BETZ drawdown of -60.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRUD and BETZ.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

TRUDBETZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.96%

-60.82%

+44.86%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

—

-29.20%

—

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

—

-29.20%

—

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

—

-59.79%

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.61%

-40.15%

+31.54%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.44%

-33.82%

+29.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

—

17.65%

—

Volatility

TRUD vs. BETZ - Volatility Comparison

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

TRUDBETZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

—

6.95%

—

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

—

16.66%

—

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.04%

20.79%

+0.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.04%

27.00%

-5.96%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.04%

27.94%

-6.90%

TRUD vs. BETZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

TRUD has a 0.16% expense ratio, which is lower than BETZ's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

TRUD vs. BETZ - Dividend Comparison

TRUD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.35%, less than BETZ's 5.17% yield.

PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
BETZ
Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF		5.17%4.57%0.86%0.00%0.66%0.00%0.28%
TRUD
VanEck Consumer Discretionary TruSector ETF		0.35%0.17%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

TRUD and BETZ have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, TRUD is cheaper at 0.16% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

TRUD is cheaper with a 0.16% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for BETZ.

BETZ has the higher dividend yield at 5.17%, compared with 0.35% for TRUD.

They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Roundhill Investments. Their fees differ too: 0.16% for TRUD and 0.75% for BETZ.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TRUD and BETZ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer