TRTY vs. MATE
TRTY (Cambria Trinity ETF) and MATE (Man Active Trend Enhanced ETF) are both Tactical Allocation funds. TRTY is passively managed, while MATE is actively managed. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TRTY charges 0.44%/yr vs 0.97%/yr for MATE.
Performance
TRTY vs. MATE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TRTY achieves a 10.10% return, which is significantly lower than MATE's 20.78% return.
TRTY
- 1D
- -0.42%
- 1M
- 0.96%
- YTD
- 10.10%
- 6M
- 11.29%
- 1Y
- 23.79%
- 3Y*
- 11.86%
- 5Y*
- 5.91%
- 10Y*
- —
MATE
- 1D
- -0.07%
- 1M
- 7.70%
- YTD
- 20.78%
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TRTY vs. MATE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
TRTY Cambria Trinity ETF | 10.10% | 0.97% |
MATE Man Active Trend Enhanced ETF | 20.78% | 4.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between TRTY and MATE is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 18, 2025 | 0.69 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TRTY vs. MATE — Risk / Return Rank
TRTY
MATE
TRTY vs. MATE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cambria Trinity ETF (TRTY) and Man Active Trend Enhanced ETF (MATE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TRTY | MATE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.50 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.35 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.99 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TRTY | MATE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.50 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.56 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.61 | 3.07 | -2.46 |
Drawdowns
TRTY vs. MATE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TRTY drawdown since its inception was -22.35%, which is greater than MATE's maximum drawdown of -13.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRTY and MATE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TRTY | MATE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.35% | -13.24% | -9.11% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.49% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -9.25% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -13.72% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.62% | -0.07% | -0.55% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.17% | -3.27% | -0.90% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.33% | — | — |
Volatility
TRTY vs. MATE - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TRTY | MATE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.35% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.25% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.54% | 21.76% | -12.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.62% | 21.76% | -11.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.41% | 21.76% | -11.35% |
TRTY vs. MATE - Expense Ratio Comparison
TRTY has a 0.44% expense ratio, which is lower than MATE's 0.97% expense ratio.
Dividends
TRTY vs. MATE - Dividend Comparison
TRTY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.01%, while MATE has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MATE Man Active Trend Enhanced ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TRTY Cambria Trinity ETF | 3.01% | 2.86% | 3.55% | 3.24% | 5.17% | 4.52% | 1.99% | 2.64% | 1.07% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TRTY and MATE have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TRTY is cheaper at 0.44% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TRTY is cheaper with a 0.44% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for MATE.
TRTY has the higher dividend yield at 3.01%, compared with 0.00% for MATE.
They also come from different issuers: Cambria and Man Group. Their fees differ too: 0.44% for TRTY and 0.97% for MATE.
Find the right allocation for TRTY and MATE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer