TRTY vs. BLNDX

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Cambria Trinity ETF (TRTY) and Standpoint Multi-Asset Fund Institutional (BLNDX).

TRTY is a passively managed fund by Cambria that tracks the performance of the Cambria Trinity Index. It was launched on Sep 10, 2018. BLNDX is managed by Ultimus Fund. It was launched on Dec 30, 2019.

Performance

TRTY vs. BLNDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cambria Trinity ETF (TRTY) and Standpoint Multi-Asset Fund Institutional (BLNDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

TRTY vs. BLNDX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
TRTY Cambria Trinity ETF	5.59%	16.35%	3.89%	3.97%	-3.30%	15.73%	1.68%
BLNDX Standpoint Multi-Asset Fund Institutional	6.56%	4.12%	13.11%	5.79%	3.71%	20.16%	16.30%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TRTY achieves a 5.59% return, which is significantly lower than BLNDX's 6.56% return.

TRTY

• 1D: 1.37%
• 1M: -3.49%
• YTD: 5.59%
• 6M: 9.31%
• 1Y: 20.96%
• 3Y*: 10.29%
• 5Y*: 6.37%
• 10Y*: —

BLNDX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: -0.13%
• YTD: 6.56%
• 6M: 10.64%
• 1Y: 16.23%
• 3Y*: 9.30%
• 5Y*: 8.73%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TRTY vs. BLNDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TRTY has a 0.44% expense ratio, which is lower than BLNDX's 1.27% expense ratio.

BLNDX

Standpoint Multi-Asset Fund Institutional

TRTY

Cambria Trinity ETF

Return for Risk

TRTY vs. BLNDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TRTY

TRTY Risk / Return Rank: 91
TRTY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 90
TRTY Sortino Ratio Rank: 89
TRTY Omega Ratio Rank: 92
TRTY Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
TRTY Martin Ratio Rank: 93

BLNDX

BLNDX Risk / Return Rank: 64
BLNDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 69
BLNDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 63
BLNDX Omega Ratio Rank: 60
BLNDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 73
BLNDX Martin Ratio Rank: 53

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TRTY vs. BLNDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cambria Trinity ETF (TRTY) and Standpoint Multi-Asset Fund Institutional (BLNDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	TRTY	BLNDX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.92	1.20	+0.72
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.47	1.58	+0.89
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.40	1.22	+0.18
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.81	1.68	+1.13
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	13.32	5.09	+8.23
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

TRTY vs. BLNDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TRTY Sharpe Ratio is 1.92, which is higher than the BLNDX Sharpe Ratio of 1.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TRTY and BLNDX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TRTY	BLNDX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.92	1.20	+0.72
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.60	0.76	-0.16
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.57	0.94	-0.38

Correlation

The correlation between TRTY and BLNDX is 0.59, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

TRTY vs. BLNDX - Dividend Comparison

TRTY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.14%, more than BLNDX's 0.69% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
TRTY Cambria Trinity ETF	3.14%	2.86%	3.55%	3.24%	5.17%	4.52%	1.99%	2.64%	1.07%
BLNDX Standpoint Multi-Asset Fund Institutional	0.69%	0.73%	5.74%	3.71%	2.67%	6.11%	1.21%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

TRTY vs. BLNDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TRTY drawdown since its inception was -22.35%, which is greater than BLNDX's maximum drawdown of -17.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRTY and BLNDX.

Drawdown Indicators

	TRTY	BLNDX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-22.35%	-17.69%	-4.66%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.52%	-9.20%	+1.68%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-13.72%	-17.69%	+3.97%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.49%	-2.35%	-1.14%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.24%	-3.26%	-0.98%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.59%	3.04%	-1.45%

Volatility

TRTY vs. BLNDX - Volatility Comparison

Cambria Trinity ETF (TRTY) has a higher volatility of 4.40% compared to Standpoint Multi-Asset Fund Institutional (BLNDX) at 3.83%. This indicates that TRTY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BLNDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TRTY	BLNDX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.40%	3.83%	+0.57%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.54%	9.91%	-1.37%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.97%	13.67%	-2.70%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.75%	11.53%	-0.78%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	10.47%	11.74%	-1.27%