TRP vs. BCS
TRP (TC Energy Corporation) and BCS (Barclays PLC) are both stocks. TRP operates in Oil & Gas Midstream (Energy), while BCS operates in Banks - Diversified (Financial Services). Over the past 10 years, TRP returned 12.24%/yr vs 14.35%/yr for BCS. At a 0.23 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
TRP vs. BCS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TRP achieves a 27.41% return, which is significantly higher than BCS's 1.28% return. Over the past 10 years, TRP has underperformed BCS with an annualized return of 12.24%, while BCS has yielded a comparatively higher 14.35% annualized return.
TRP
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- 3.47%
- YTD
- 27.41%
- 6M
- 29.66%
- 1Y
- 45.12%
- 3Y*
- 30.95%
- 5Y*
- 14.55%
- 10Y*
- 12.24%
BCS
- 1D
- 2.91%
- 1M
- 11.51%
- YTD
- 1.28%
- 6M
- 8.12%
- 1Y
- 46.32%
- 3Y*
- 52.43%
- 5Y*
- 24.10%
- 10Y*
- 14.35%
TRP vs. BCS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TRP TC Energy Corporation | 27.41% | 24.02% | 39.88% | 6.09% | -7.83% | 20.99% | -19.09% | 56.30% | -22.64% | 13.51% |
BCS Barclays PLC | 1.28% | 96.49% | 76.26% | 6.01% | -21.90% | 31.71% | -12.84% | 31.90% | -29.25% | 0.44% |
Correlation
The correlation between TRP and BCS is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 30, 1987 | 0.23 |
The correlation between TRP and BCS shifts across timeframes, from 0.12 (1 year) to 0.33 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
TRP:
$72.30B
BCS:
$87.41B
TRP:
CA$3.31
BCS:
£2.06
TRP:
29.33
BCS:
9.23
TRP:
0.40
BCS:
1.67
TRP:
6.40
BCS:
2.32
TRP:
3.99
BCS:
0.85
TRP:
CA$15.76B
BCS:
£28.57B
TRP:
CA$8.07B
BCS:
£26.96B
TRP:
CA$10.90B
BCS:
£9.15B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TRP vs. BCS — Risk / Return Rank
TRP
BCS
TRP vs. BCS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TC Energy Corporation (TRP) and Barclays PLC (BCS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TRP | BCS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.98 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.54 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.27 | +0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.70 | 1.78 | +2.92 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.42 | 5.03 | +9.39 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TRP vs. BCS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TRP drawdown since its inception was -62.52%, smaller than the maximum BCS drawdown of -94.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRP and BCS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TRP | BCS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -62.52% | -94.36% | +31.84% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.65% | -26.20% | +16.55% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.00% | -26.20% | +9.20% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.05% | -48.14% | +11.09% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.64% | -66.10% | +24.46% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.14% | -24.68% | +22.54% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.72% | -38.42% | +26.70% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.26% | 9.23% | -5.97% |
Volatility
TRP vs. BCS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for TC Energy Corporation (TRP) is 5.62%, while Barclays PLC (BCS) has a volatility of 10.56%. This indicates that TRP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BCS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TRP | BCS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.62% | 10.56% | -4.94% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.27% | 24.06% | -10.79% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.71% | 29.37% | -11.66% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.86% | 34.06% | -12.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.83% | 37.71% | -12.88% |
Dividends
TRP vs. BCS - Dividend Comparison
TRP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.58%, more than BCS's 1.83% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BCS Barclays PLC | 1.83% | 1.70% | 3.13% | 4.86% | 4.18% | 1.61% | 3.91% | 3.68% | 3.21% | 1.37% | 2.26% | 2.95% |
TRP TC Energy Corporation | 3.58% | 4.45% | 5.93% | 7.73% | 8.52% | 5.94% | 5.92% | 4.25% | 5.85% | 5.14% | 5.01% | 6.38% |
Financials
TRP vs. BCS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between TC Energy Corporation and Barclays PLC. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
TRP vs. BCS - Profitability Comparison
TRP - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, TC Energy Corporation reported a gross profit of 2.41B and revenue of 4.24B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 56.7%.
BCS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Barclays PLC reported a gross profit of 8.16B and revenue of 8.16B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 100.0%.
TRP - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, TC Energy Corporation reported an operating income of 2.21B and revenue of 4.24B, resulting in an operating margin of 52.1%.
BCS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Barclays PLC reported an operating income of 2.81B and revenue of 8.16B, resulting in an operating margin of 34.5%.
TRP - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, TC Energy Corporation reported a net income of 929.40M and revenue of 4.24B, resulting in a net margin of 21.9%.
BCS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Barclays PLC reported a net income of 2.18B and revenue of 8.16B, resulting in a net margin of 26.7%.
Frequently Asked Questions
TRP and BCS have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BCS has higher volatility (10.56%) compared to TRP (5.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TRP dropped -62.52% vs BCS's -94.36%.
TRP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.56 vs 1.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TRP and BCS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer